Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007
- No longer in force
- CELEX number: 32010R0961
- Official Journal: JOL_2010_281_R_0001_01
- Form: Regulation
- Procedure number: 2010/0240(NLE), 2010/0240/NLE
- Languages:
- bg
- cs
- da
- de
- el
- en
- et
- fi
- fr
- hu
- it
- lv
- lt
- mt
- nl
- pl
- pt
- ro
- sk
- sl
- es
- sv
Dates
Date of document: - October 25, 2010
- October 27, 2010
- October 27, 2010
- Entry into force - Date pub. See Art 41
- March 23, 2012
- Repealed by 32012R0267
Modified by
Modified by:
- Règlement (UE) n ° 56/2012 du Conseil du 23 janvier 2012 modifiant le règlement (UE) n ° 961/2010 concernant l'adoption de mesures restrictives à l'encontre de l'Iran - detail
- Règlement d'exécution (UE) n ° 1245/2011 du Conseil du 1 er décembre 2011 mettant en œuvre le règlement (UE) n ° 961/2010 concernant l'adoption de mesures restrictives à l'encontre de l'Iran - detail
- Règlement d'exécution (UE) n ° 54/2012 du Conseil du 23 janvier 2012 mettant en œuvre le règlement (UE) n ° 961/2010 concernant l'adoption de mesures restrictives à l'encontre de l'Iran - detail
- Règlement d’exécution (UE) n ° 503/2011 du Conseil du 23 mai 2011 mettant en œuvre le règlement (UE) n ° 961/2010 concernant l’adoption de mesures restrictives à l’encontre de l’Iran - detail
All documents based on this document:
- Règlement d’exécution (UE) n ° 503/2011 du Conseil du 23 mai 2011 mettant en œuvre le règlement (UE) n ° 961/2010 concernant l’adoption de mesures restrictives à l’encontre de l’Iran
- Règlement d'exécution (UE) n ° 1245/2011 du Conseil du 1 er décembre 2011 mettant en œuvre le règlement (UE) n ° 961/2010 concernant l'adoption de mesures restrictives à l'encontre de l'Iran
- Règlement d'exécution (UE) n ° 54/2012 du Conseil du 23 janvier 2012 mettant en œuvre le règlement (UE) n ° 961/2010 concernant l'adoption de mesures restrictives à l'encontre de l'Iran
Modifies
Implicit repeal:
- 2007/242/CE: Décision du Conseil du 23 avril 2007 mettant en œuvre l'article 7, paragraphe 2, du règlement (CE) n o 423/2007 concernant l'adoption de mesures restrictives à l'encontre de l'Iran
- Règlement (CE) n° 116/2008 de la Commission du 28 janvier 2008 modifiant le règlement (CE) n° 423/2007 du Conseil concernant l’adoption de mesures restrictives à l’encontre de l’Iran
- Règlement (UE) n o 1228/2009 du Conseil du 15 décembre 2009 modifiant le règlement (CE) n o 423/2007 concernant l'adoption de mesures restrictives à l'encontre de l'Iran
- Règlement (CE) n o 618/2007 du Conseil du 5 juin 2007 modifiant le règlement (CE) n o 423/2007 concernant l’adoption de mesures restrictives à l’encontre de l’Iran
- Règlement (UE) n ° 532/2010 de la Commission du 18 juin 2010 modifiant le règlement (CE) n ° 423/2007 concernant l'adoption de mesures restrictives à l'encontre de l'Iran
- Règlement d’exécution (UE) n ° 668/2010 du Conseil du 26 juillet 2010 mettant en œuvre l’article 7, paragraphe 2, du règlement (CE) n ° 423/2007 concernant l’adoption de mesures restrictives à l’encontre de l’Iran
- Règlement (CE) n o 1100/2009 du Conseil du 17 novembre 2009 mettant en œuvre l’article 7, paragraphe 2, du règlement (CE) n o 423/2007 concernant l’adoption de mesures restrictives à l’encontre de l’Iran et abrogeant la décision 2008/475/CE
- Règlement (CE) n o 1110/2008 du Conseil du 10 novembre 2008 modifiant le règlement (CE) n o 423/2007 concernant l'adoption de mesures restrictives à l'encontre de l'Iran
- Règlement (CE) n° 219/2008 de la Commission du 11 mars 2008 modifiant le règlement (CE) n° 423/2007 du Conseil concernant l’adoption de mesures restrictives à l’encontre de l’Iran
Affected by case
- Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2021. Bank Sepah v Overseas Financial Limited and Oaktree Finance Limited. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation. Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran – Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 – Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies recognised by the Council of the European Union as being engaged in nuclear proliferation – Concepts of ‘freezing of funds’ and ‘freezing of economic resources’ – Possibility of applying a protective measure in respect of frozen funds and economic resources – Claim pre-dating the freezing of assets and unrelated to Iran’s nuclear and ballistic programme. Case C-340/20.
- A01LH
- A01LI
- A16P1
- Case C-340/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 24 July 2020 — Bank Sepah v Overseas Financial Limited, Oaktree Finance Limited
- article 1 point (i)
- article 1 point (h)
- article 16 paragraph 1
- Case C-319/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Paris (France) lodged on 29 June 2015 — Overseas Financial Limited, Oaktree Finance Limited v Ministre de l’économie, de l'industrie et du numérique
- article 17
- Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 February 2013. Melli Bank plc v Council of the European Union. Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Entity wholly owned by an entity identified as being involved in nuclear proliferation - Plea of illegality - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection. Case T-492/10.
- Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 March 2013. Bank Saderat plc v Council of the European Union. Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Entity wholly owned by an entity identified as being involved in nuclear proliferation - Plea of illegality - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection. Case T-495/10.
- A16P2LA
- Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2013. Bank Kargoshaei and Others v Council of the European Union. Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Legitimate expectations - Review of the restrictive measures adopted - Error of assessment - Equal treatment - Legal basis - Essential procedural requirements - Proportionality - Right to property. Case T-8/11.
- Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2013. Bank Melli Iran v Council of the European Union. Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Legitimate expectations - Review of the restrictive measures adopted - Error of assessment - Equal treatment - Legal basis - Essential procedural requirements - Proportionality. Cases T-35/10 and T-7/11.
- Case T-187/13: Action brought on 2 April 2013 — Jannatian v Council
- Case T-496/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2013 — Bank Mellat v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment)
- annex VIII PT4.B)
- Case T-69/12: Action brought on 17 February 2012 — Zavvar v Council
- article 16 P2
- Case T-68/12: Action brought on 10 February 2012 — Hemmati v Council
- article 16 P2
- annex VIII P7PTA)
- Case T-15/11: Action brought on 6 January 2011 — Sina Bank v Council
- annex 8 S.B/P.8
- Case T-328/14: Action brought on 13 May 2014 — Jannatian v Council
- Case T-4/11: Action brought on 7 January 2011 — Export Development Bank of Iran v Council
- Case T-67/12: Action brought on 10 February 2012 — Sina Bank v Council
- article 16 P2
- Case T-24/11: Action brought on 19 January 2011 — Bank Refah Kargaran v Council
- Case T-35/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Kyocera Mita Europe v Commission
- Case T-384/11: Action brought on 22 July 2011 — Safa Nicu Sepahan v Council
- annex VIII PT19
- Case T-71/12: Action brought on 17 February 2012 — Meskarian v Council
- article 16 P2
- Case T-72/12: Action brought on 17 February 2012 — Bank Mellat v Council
- article 16 P2
- Case T-562/10: Action brought on 16 December 2010 — HTTS Hanseatic Trade Trust & Shipping v Council
- Case T-66/12: Action brought on 13 February 2012 — Sedghi and Azizi v Council
- article 16 P2
- Case T-70/12: Action brought on 17 February 2012 — Divandari v Council
- article 16 P2
- Case T-8/11: Action brought on 7 January 2011 — Bank Kargoshaei and Others v Council
- annex VIII B.5
- Case T-53/12: Action brought on 12 February 2012 — CF Sharp Shipping Agencies Pte v Council
Legal basis
- 2010/413/CFSP: Council Decision of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP
EuroVoc Vocabulary
- Economic resources
- Common Foreign and Security Policy
- Technology transfer
- Iran
- Dual-use good
- Economic sanctions
- Nuclear non-proliferation
- Export monitoring
- International sanctions
- Common foreign and security policy