Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and originating in the People's Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96
- No longer in force
- CELEX number: 32009R1294
- Official Journal: JOL_2009_352_R_0001_01
- Form: Regulation
- Procedure number: --
- Languages:
- bg
- cs
- da
- de
- el
- en
- et
- fi
- fr
- hu
- it
- lv
- lt
- mt
- nl
- pl
- pt
- ro
- sk
- sl
- es
- sv
Dates
Date of document: - December 22, 2009
- December 30, 2009
- December 31, 2009
- Entry into force - Date pub. + 1 See Art 2
- March 31, 2011
- Entry into force + 15 Month See Art. 2
Modified by
Modifies
Affected by case
- Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 February 2016. C & J Clark International Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs and Puma SE v Hauptzollamt Nürnberg. Requests for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) and the Finanzgericht München. References for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Validity of Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 — WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Article 2(7) — Determination of dumping — Imports from non-market economy countries — Claims for market economy treatment — Time limit — Article 9(5) and (6) — Claims for individual treatment — Article 17 — Sampling — Article 3(1), (5) and (6), Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) — Cooperation of the Union industry — Article 3(2) and (7) — Determination of injury — Other known factors — Community Customs Code — Article 236(1) and (2) — Repayment of duties not legally owed — Time limit — Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure — Invalidity of a regulation which imposed anti-dumping duties. Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14.
- Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2017. T.KUP SAS v Belgische Staat. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel. Reference for a preliminary ruling — Dumping — Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 — Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Validity of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 — Expiry review of anti-dumping measures — Unrelated importers — Sampling — European Union interest. Case C-349/16.
- Case C-349/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 24 June 2016 — T.KUP SAS v Belgische Staat
- Case T-134/10: Action brought on 19 March 2010 — FESI v Conseil
EuroVoc Vocabulary
- Originating product
- Commercial policy
- Anti-dumping measures
- Leather
- Footwear industry
- Anti-dumping duty
- Import (EU)
- Viet Nam
- Macao
- Dumping
- China