Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/761 of 16 February 2018 establishing common safety methods for supervision by national safety authorities after the issue of a single safety certificate or a safety authorisation pursuant to Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) No 1077/2012 (Text with EEA relevance. )
Modified by
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/782of 12 June 2020amending Delegated Regulations (EU) 2018/761 and (EU) 2018/762 as regards their dates of application following the extension of the transposition deadline of Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council(Text with EEA relevance), 32020R0782, June 15, 2020
(a) "safety certification body" means the body responsible for issuing a single safety certificate, either the Agency or a national safety authority; (b) "residual concern" means a minor issue identified during the assessment of an application for a single safety certificate or for a safety authorisation which does not prevent their issuing and can be deferred for later supervision.
(a) a description of major non-compliances, which may affect safety performance or create serious safety risks, and any other area of concern identified during supervision activities since the previous assessment; (b) the status of the action plan (or plans) established by the railway undertaking or infrastructure manager to resolve major non-compliances and any other area of concern referred to in point (a) and relevant actions that have been taken by the national safety authority to supervise resolution of these issues; (c) an overview of the safety performance of the railway undertaking or infrastructure manager operating in its Member State; (d) the status of the action plan (or plans) established by the railway undertaking or infrastructure manager to resolve residual concerns from previous assessment.
(a) knowledge of the relevant regulatory framework as it applies to supervision; (b) knowledge of the functioning of the railway system; (c) appropriate level of critical analysis; (d) experience in the supervision of a safety or similar management system in the railway sector, or a safety management system in a sector with equivalent operational and technical challenges; (e) knowledge of and experience in interviewing skills; (f) problem solving, communication and teamworking.
(a) the development of competence profiles for each job, position or role; (b) the recruitment of staff in accordance with the established competence profiles; (c) the maintenance, development and assessment of staff competence in accordance with the established competence profiles.
(a) collect and analyse data/information from a variety of sources as an input to the strategy and the plan or plans. Sources could include information gathered during the assessment of safety management systems, outcomes of previous supervision activities, information from authorisations of subsystems or vehicles, national investigation bodies accident reports/recommendations, other accident/incident reports or data, railway undertakings' or infrastructure managers' annual safety reports to the national safety authority, annual maintenance reports from entities in charge of maintenance, complaints from members of the public and other relevant sources; (b) identify in the supervision strategy risk areas for targeted supervision activities, including those emerging from the integration and management of human and organisational factors, where relevant; (c) develop a supervision plan or plans showing how it will give effect to the supervision strategy during the lifecycle of valid single safety certificates and safety authorisations; (d) produce an initial estimate of resources required to give effect to the plan or plans, based on the target areas identified; (e) allocate resources to give effect to the plan or plans; (f) address in the supervision strategy and plan(s) any matters relating to cross-border operations or infrastructure(s) through coordination with other national safety authority (or authorities).
(a) communicate the overall objectives of the supervision strategy and overall explanation of the plan or plans to relevant railway undertakings or infrastructure managers and, where appropriate, more widely to other stakeholders; (b) provide relevant railway undertakings or infrastructure managers with an overall explanation on how the supervision plan or plans will be undertaken.
(a) give effect to the plan or plans; (b) take proportionate action(s) to deal with failure of a railway undertaking or an infrastructure manager to comply with its legal obligations, including issuing any urgent safety alerts and applying temporary safety measures when necessary; (c) evaluate how adequately a railway undertaking or an infrastructure manager has developed and implemented an action plan or plans to remedy any non-compliance or residual concern within a specified time period; (d) document the results of its supervision activities.
(a) share results of its supervision activities with the relevant railway undertaking or infrastructure manager, including identifying areas of non-compliance on the part of the railway undertaking or infrastructure manager and any areas of good practice to support safety improvement; (b) have an overview of the safety performance of the individual railway undertakings or infrastructure managers operating in its Member State; (c) publish and communicate to relevant stakeholders its views on the overall safety performance in the Member State; (d) publish and communicate to relevant stakeholders its views on the effectiveness of the safety regulatory framework; (e) use and when relevant, share information on the performance of the safety management system gathered during the supervision of railway undertakings or infrastructure managers, prior to reassessing the application for a renewal or an update of the single safety certificate or the safety authorisation, with the Agency acting as safety certification body or the relevant national safety authority, in the case of cross-border infrastructure; (f) where appropriate, take any enforcement actions, identify whether there is a case for restricting or revoking the single safety certificate or safety authorisation and in cases where it is not responsible for issuing the single safety certificate or safety authorisation, inform the competent authority accordingly.
(a) conduct a review of the supervision strategy and plan(s) to check that the original targeted activity, use of data/information from a variety of sources, supervision outcomes and resource allocation are appropriate, changing priorities as necessary; (b) revise the plan or plans if needed and consider the impact of the changes on the supervision strategy; (c) contribute when necessary with its views and any proposals to its Member State to overcome any deficiencies in the safety regulatory framework.
1. Agree which railway undertakings and infrastructure managers are operating in such a manner as to require coordinated or joint supervision. 2. Agree on common language(s) and the level of confidentiality of the information to be used for the purposes of their coordination arrangements. 3. Agree what information to exchange and a timetable for the exchange: (a) exchange relevant information on railway undertakings and infrastructure managers identified under point 1 and share results from their assessment activities; (b) provide copies of safety authorisations where appropriate; (c) share results from related supervision activities, including enforcement decisions and actions, where relevant; (d) share information on the safety performance of railway undertakings and infrastructure managers identified under point 1 in each Member State.
4. Share decision-making criteria: (a) share information on how each national safety authority targets its activities for each railway undertaking and infrastructure manager concerned as part of the supervision plan; (b) establish a dialogue between relevant national safety authorities on the proposed response to dealing with major compliance gaps.
5. Manage coordination: (a) share existing supervision strategies and plans; (b) establish common points of interest and/or common issues; (c) plan efficiently individual, coordinated or joint initiatives without causing unnecessary inconvenience to the railway undertakings and infrastructure managers and by avoiding overlaps in the scope of these initiatives.
6. Agree on which national safety authority (or authorities) should follow up actions aimed to address residual concerns which have been deferred for supervision where appropriate. 7. Agree what areas to target in a coordinated or joint manner: (a) identify key risks for the relevant railway undertakings and infrastructure managers to be addressed in a coordinated or joint manner by national safety authorities; (b) agree which national safety authority will lead activities on what issues, where relevant, on the basis of well-established criteria; (c) agree what types of joint supervision activities to undertake, where relevant; (d) agree how railway undertakings and infrastructure managers should be made aware of the arrangements and agreements national safety authorities are reaching.
8. Share good practice: (a) develop arrangements to review and coordinate on a regular basis the supervision activities for the relevant railway undertakings and infrastructure managers; (b) develop arrangements to evaluate the effectiveness of the coordination and cooperation between national safety authorities, including the Agency as appropriate.
Loading ...