Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1369/2013 of 13 December 2013 on Union support for the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme in Lithuania, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1990/2006
Corrected by
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1369/2013 of 13 December 2013 on Union support for the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme in Lithuania, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1990/2006, 32013R1369R(01), January 11, 2014
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1369/2013 of 13 December 2013 on Union support for the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme in Lithuania, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1990/2006, 32013R1369R(02), April 24, 2014
Council Regulation (EU) No 1369/2013of 13 December 2013on Union support for the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme in Lithuania, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1990/2006THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the 2003 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 56 thereof and Protocol No 4 thereto,Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,Whereas:(1)According to Protocol No 4 on the Ignalina nuclear power plant in LithuaniaOJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 944. attached to the 2003 Act of Accession ("Protocol No 4"), acknowledging in 2004 the readiness of the Union to provide adequate additional Union assistance to the efforts by Lithuania to decommission the Ignalina nuclear power plant and highlighting this expression of solidarity, Lithuania committed to the closure of unit 1 of the Ignalina nuclear power plant before 2005 and of unit 2 of that plant by 31 December 2009 at the latest, and to the subsequent decommissioning of those units. In line with its obligations, Lithuania shut down both units concerned within the respective deadlines.(2)In line with its obligations under the Accession Treaty and with Union assistance, Lithuania has closed the Ignalina nuclear power plant and made significant progress towards its decommissioning. Further work is necessary in order to continue the progress with the actual decontamination, dismantling, management of spent fuel and radioactive waste operations and to implement the steady process towards the decommissioning end state in accordance with the decommissioning plan, whilst ensuring that the highest safety standards are applied. Based on the available estimates, completion of decommissioning work will require substantial additional financial resources.(3)Recognising that the premature shutdown and consequent decommissioning of the Ignalina nuclear power plant with two 1500 MW RBMK type reactor units inherited from the Soviet Union is of an unprecedented nature and represents for Lithuania an exceptional financial burden not commensurate with the size and economic strength of the country, Protocol No 4 states that the Union assistance under the Ignalina programme will be seamlessly continued and extended beyond 2006, for the period of next financial perspectives.(4)The Union has committed to assist Lithuania in addressing the exceptional financial burden imposed by the decommissioning process. Since the pre-accession period, Lithuania has received substantial financial support from the Union, notably through the Ignalina programme established for the period 2007 - 2013. The Union financial support under that programme will end in 2013.(5)Acknowledging the Union's commitment under Protocol No. 4 and following the request for further funding from Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia, provision has been made in the Commission proposal for the next multi-annual financial framework for the period 2014-2020: "A Budget for Europe 2020" for an amount of EUR 700 million from the general budget of the Union for nuclear safety and decommissioning. From this, the amount of EUR 860 million in 2011 prices which is approximately EUR 969 million in current prices, is foreseen for a new programme to further support the decommissioning of the Bohunice V1 units 1 and 2, the Ignalina units 1 and 2 and the Kozloduy units 1 to 4 for the period from 2014 to 2020.(6)The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice programmes, as well as the programming period and the distribution of funds amongst those programmes may be reviewed based on the results of the mid-term and the final evaluation reports.(7)The support pursuant to this Regulation should ensure the seamless continuation of decommissioning and concentrate on measures to implement the steady process towards the decommissioning end state, whilst ensuring that the highest safety standards are applied, as such measures bring the greatest Union added value, while the ultimate responsibility for nuclear safety remains with the Member State concerned. This Regulation does not prejudge the outcome of any future State aid procedures that may be undertaken in accordance with Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).(8)This Regulation is without prejudice to the rights and obligations of the Member State concerned under the Accession Treaty, in particular under Protocol No 4.(9)The decommissioning of the nuclear power plant covered by this Regulation should be carried out with recourse to the best available technical expertise, and with due regard to the nature and technological specifications of the units to be shut down, in order to ensure the highest possible efficiency, thus taking into account international best practices.(10)The activities covered by this Regulation and the operations which they support should comply with applicable Union and national law. The decommissioning of the nuclear power plant covered by this Regulation should be carried out in accordance with the legislation on nuclear safety, namely Council Directive 2009/71/EuratomCouncil Directive 2009/71/Euratom of 25 June 2009 establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations (OJ L 172, 2.7.2009, p. 18)., waste management, namely Council Directive 2011/70/EuratomCouncil Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011 establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste (OJ L 199, 2.8.2011, p. 48)., and the environment, in particular Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the CouncilDirective 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 114). and Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the CouncilDirective 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 26, 28.1.2012, p. 1)..(11)The activities covered by this Regulation and the operations which they support should be based on an up–to–date decommissioning plan covering the decommissioning activities, their associated schedule, costs and required human resources. The costs should be established according to internationally recognised standards for the estimation of decommissioning costs, such as, for example, the International Structure for Decommissioning Costing jointly published by the Nuclear Energy Agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency and the European Commission.(12)An effective control of the evolution of the decommissioning process should be ensured by the Commission in order to assure the highest Union added value of the funding allocated under this Regulation, although the final responsibility for the decommissioning rests with the Member State concerned. This includes the measurement of effective performance and the assessment of corrective measures during the Ignalina programme.(13)The financial interests of the Union should be protected through proportionate measures throughout the expenditure cycle, including the prevention, detection and investigation of irregularities, the recovery of funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used and, where appropriate, penalties.(14)Since the objectives of this Regulation, in particular as regards the provisions for adequate financial resources for the continuation of safe decommissioning, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.(15)Certain measures under the Ignalina programme may require a high level of financing from the Union, which may, in well–founded exceptional cases, amount to the full amount of the funding. However, every effort should be made to continue the co-financing practice established under the pre-accession assistance and the assistance provided over the period 2007-2013 for the decommissioning efforts of Lithuania, as well as to attract co-financing from other sources as appropriate.(16)In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards the adoption of annual work programmes and detailed implementation procedures. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilRegulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13)..(17)Council Regulation (EC) No 1990/2006Council Regulation (EC) No 1990/2006 of 21 December 2006 on the implementation of Protocol No 4 on the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania to the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia (Ignalina Programme) (OJ L 411, 30.12.2006, p. 10). should be repealed.(18)Due account was taken of the Court of Auditors' Special report No 16/2011 on EU financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia, its recommendations and the reply from the Commission,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: