Commission Regulation (EC) No 491/2008 of 3 June 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 concerning production refunds in the cereals sector
Modified by
  • Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2013of 21 February 2013adapting certain regulations and decisions in the fields of free movement of goods, freedom of movement for persons, right of establishment and freedom to provide services, company law, competition policy, agriculture, food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy, fisheries, transport policy, energy, taxation, statistics, social policy and employment, environment, customs union, external relations, and foreign, security and defence policy, by reason of the accession of Croatia, 32013R0519, June 10, 2013
Commission Regulation (EC) No 491/2008of 3 June 2008laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 concerning production refunds in the cereals sector THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 361/2008 (OJ L 121, 7.5.2008, p. 1)., and in particular Article 98 in conjunction with Article 4 thereof, Whereas: (1)Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organization of the market in cerealsOJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 735/2007 (OJ L 169, 29.6.2007, p. 6). is to be repealed from 1 July 2008 under Article 201(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007. (2)Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1722/93 of 30 June 1993 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 concerning production refunds in the cereals sectorOJ L 159, 1.7.1993, p. 112. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1996/2006 (OJ L 398, 30.12.2006, p. 1). has been substantially amended several times. Following the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as single CMO Regulation it is appropriate to adapt Regulation (EEC) No 1722/93 accordingly. In the interests of clarity, that Regulation should be repealed and replaced by a new Regulation. (3)In view of the special situation of the market in starch, and particularly the need to keep prices competitive in relation to starch produced in third countries and imported as goods in respect of which the import arrangements do not provide sufficient protection for Community producers, Article 96 of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 provides for the grant of a production refund for starch obtained from maize, wheat or potatoes and for certain derivatives used in the manufacture of certain products a list of which is drawn up by the Commission, or in the absence of significant domestic production of other cereals for the production of starch, in Finland and Sweden each marketing year a certain amount of starch from barley or oats, in so far as this does not entail an increase in the level of starch production from those two cereals. The granting of this refund aims to enable the user industries concerned to have access to starch and certain derivatives at a lower price than that which would result from applying the rules of the common organization of the market in the products in question. (4)Pursuant to Article 98 of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, it is necessary to adopt detailed rules for the grant of production refunds, including rules for control and payment, so that the same rules are applied in all Member States. (5)The Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 provides for a list to be drawn up of products the manufacture of which uses starch giving rise to entitlement to the refund. (6)To ensure that control measures are effective, provision should be made for beneficiaries of the refund to be approved in advance by the Member States in whose territory the abovementioned products are manufactured. (7)It is necessary to define how the production refund is to be calculated and how often it is to be fixed. The most satisfactory calculation method is at present based on the difference between the market price for cereals and the price used to calculate the import duty. For reasons of stability, the production refund should as a general rule be fixed every month and, as a means of checking that the production refund is of the correct value, the prices of cereals should be monitored on the world and the most representatives Community markets. It should be clarified which Community markets are to be monitored, and this monitoring should be limited to maize. Since taking other cereal prices into account has not had any practical effect in the past on calculating the amount of the refund, references to other cereals should therefore not be necessary. (8)Production refunds are to be paid for the use of starch and certain derived products in the manufacture of certain goods; detailed information is required to facilitate the appropriate control and payment of the production refunds to applicants; the competent authority in the Member State concerned should be empowered to require applicants to supply any information and allow any checks or inspections necessary to effect such controls. (9)The manufacturer of the product may not necessarily use basic starch and it is therefore necessary to draw up a list of certain products derived from starch the use of which will give the manufacturer the right to receive the refund. (10)The special characteristics of esterified or etherified starch could lead to certain speculative processing operations designed to receive the production refund more than once; so as to prevent such speculation, measures are needed to ensure that esterified or etherified starch is not reprocessed into a raw material the use of which gives the right to apply for a refund. The level of the security should be adapted to prevent such speculation. (11)The production refund should not be paid until processing has taken place. Once processing has taken place, payment should be made within five months following verification by the competent authority that the starch has been processed. However, it should be possible for the manufacturer to receive an advance before completion of the controls. (12)With a view to simplification and reducing administrative burdens and the costs of re-converting modified starches it is appropriate to increase the amount of the production refund below which control measures are not deemed to be necessary, without expanding the risk for inappropriate spending of Community resources. (13)Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 of 22 July 1985 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of securities for agricultural productsOJ L 205, 3.8.1985, p. 5. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2006 (OJ L 365, 21.12.2006, p. 52)., applies to the arrangements provided for in this Regulation. Therefore, the primary requirements of the obligations incumbent on manufacturers and guaranteed by the lodging of a security should be defined. (14)The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chairman, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Loading ...