Council Regulation (EC) No 55/2008 of 21 January 2008 introducing autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova and amending Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 and Commission Decision 2005/924/EC
Modified by
Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2008of 20 November 2008amending Regulation (EC) No 55/2008 introducing autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova, 32008R1210, December 6, 2008
Regulation (EU) No 581/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Councilof 8 June 2011amending Council Regulation (EC) No 55/2008 introducing autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova, 32011R0581, June 24, 2011
Council Regulation (EC) No 55/2008of 21 January 2008introducing autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova and amending Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 and Commission Decision 2005/924/ECTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas:(1)The relationship between the European Union (EU) and the Republic of Moldova (hereinafter referred to as Moldova) builds on the Partnership and Cooperation AgreementOJ L 181, 24.6.1998, p. 3. that entered into force on 1 July 1998. One of its main objectives is to promote trade and investment and harmonious economic relations between the Parties and so to foster their sustainable economic development.(2)In the European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan (ENP Action Plan) for Moldova, which was agreed in 2005, the EU committed itself to consider the possibility of granting Moldova additional Autonomous Trade Preferences (ATPs), provided that Moldova substantially improved its system of controls and certification of origin of goods. In 2006 Moldova reformed its customs legislation and a satisfactory level of implementation of the new legislation was reached at the beginning of 2007.(3)Until Romania’s accession to the EU on 1 January 2007, Moldova had a free trade regime with Romania. On the whole, the effect of the 2007 enlargement was negligible for Moldova, but it had a negative impact on a few key export products of Moldova.(4)Pursuant to Commission Decision 2005/924/ECOJ L 337, 22.12.2005, p. 50., Moldova already benefits from the special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance (the GSP+) provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 of 27 June 2005 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferencesOJ L 169, 30.6.2005, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 606/2007 (OJ L 141, 2.6.2007, p. 4). (GSPs).(5)The general level of imports from Moldova is merely 0,03 % of all Community imports. Further market opening is expected to support the development of Moldova’s economy through increased export performance while not creating negative effects for the Community.(6)It is therefore appropriate to extend autonomous trade preferences to Moldova by removing all remaining tariff ceilings for industrial products and by improving access to the Community market for agricultural products.(7)In accordance with ENP Action Plan, the level of ambition of the EU-Moldova relationship will depend on the degree of Moldova’s commitment to common values as well as its capacity to implement jointly agreed priorities, including the readiness to engage in effective economic reforms. Furthermore, to benefit from the additional tariff preferences under the GSP+ regime, Moldova has fulfilled the conditions of ratifying and effectively implementing core international conventions on human and labour rights, environmental protection and good governance. To ensure Moldova maintains the level of progress it has achieved, the granting of additional autonomous trade preferences will be subject to continued implementation of, and compliance with, the priorities and conditions set in the ENP Action Plan and the GSP+.(8)In addition, entitlement to benefit from autonomous trade preferences is conditional on Moldova’s compliance with the relevant rules of origin of products and the procedures related thereto as well as involvement in effective administrative cooperation with the Community in order to prevent any risk of fraud.(9)The reasons for temporary suspension of preferences should include serious and systematic violations of the conditions for the entitlement to the preferential arrangements, fraud or failure to provide administrative cooperation for the verification of origin of goods and failure of Moldova to show continued engagement in the implementation of the priorities set in the ENP Action Plan and the covenants, conventions and protocols listed in Annex II.(10)It is necessary to provide for the reintroduction of Common Customs Tariff duties for any products causing, or threatening to cause, serious difficulties to a Community producer of like or directly competing products, subject to an investigation by the Commission.(11)For the purposes of defining the concept of originating products, certification of origin and administrative cooperation procedures, Title IV, Chapter 2, section 2 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs CodeOJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 214/2007 (OJ L 62, 1.3.2007, p. 6). will apply.(12)For the sake of rationalisation and simplification, it is appropriate to provide that the Commission may, having consulted the Customs Code Committee and without prejudice to the specific procedures provided for in this Regulation, make any necessary changes and technical amendments to this Regulation.(13)The measures necessary for the implementation of this Regulation should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the CommissionOJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23. Decision as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC (OJ L 200, 22.7.2006, p. 1)..(14)The introduction of the proposed measures for products originating in Moldova will make the inclusion of Moldova in the Community’s scheme of generalised tariff preferences superfluous. It is therefore appropriate to remove Moldova from the list of beneficiaries of Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 and from the list of the beneficiary countries which qualify for the GSP+ in Decision 2005/924/EC.(15)The import arrangements adopted by this Regulation should be renewed on the basis of the conditions established by the Council and in the light of the experience gained in granting them. It is therefore appropriate to limit their duration to 31 December 2012,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: