Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims Basic information Dates Date of document: Date of publication: Date of effect: January 21, 2005 Partial application - See Art 33.2 Entry into force - See Art 33.1 October 21, 2005 Partial application - See Art 33.2 Modified by Corrected by: Modified by: All documents based on this document: Modifies Affected by case Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2017. Ibrica Zulfikarpašić v Slaven Gajer. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu – Stalna služba u Samoboru. Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Requirements for certification as a European Enforcement Order — Concept of ‘court’ — Notary who has issued a writ of execution based on an ‘authentic document’ — Authentic instrument. Case C-484/15. Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 February 2023. Lufthansa Technik AERO Alzey GmbH v Arik Air Limited and Others. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas. Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 – European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims – Article 23(c) – Stay of enforcement of a judgment certified as a European Enforcement Order – Exceptional circumstances – Concept. Case C-393/21. Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 February 2018. Collect Inkasso OÜ and Others v Rain Aint and Others. Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European enforcement order for uncontested claims — Requirements for certification — Minimum standards for uncontested claims procedures — Rights of the debtor — No indication of the address of the institution to which a notice may be addressed contesting the claim or before which an appeal against the decision may be brought. Case C-289/17. Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019. RD v SC. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích. Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Certification of a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order — Minimum standards applicable to uncontested claims procedures — Defendant without a known address who did not appear at the hearing. Case C-518/18. Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 15 March 2012. G v Cornelius de Visser. Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Regensburg. Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Public notification of legal documents — Lack of known domicile or place of abode of the defendant in the territory of a Member State — Jurisdiction ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict’ — Infringement of the right to protection of personality liable to have been committed by the publication of photographs on the Internet — Place where the harmful event occurred or may occur. Case C-292/10. Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 December 2015. Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen. Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Conditions for certification — Rights of the debtor — Review of the judgment. Case C-300/14. Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 December 2017. Grzegorz Chudaś and Irena Chudaś v DA Deutsche Allgemeine Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft AG. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Poznań-Grunwald i Jeżyce w Poznaniu. Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — Scope — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Enforcement orders capable of being certified as European Enforcement Orders — Decision on the amount of costs related to the court proceedings in a judgment not concerning an uncontested claim — Excluded. Case C-66/17. Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber), 5 December 2013. Walter Vapenik v Josef Thurner. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg. Area of freedom, security and justice — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European enforcement order for uncontested claims — Requirements for certification as an enforcement order — Situation in which the judgment was given in the Member State of the creditor in a dispute between two persons not engaged in commercial or professional activities. Case C‑508/12. Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2016. Pebros Servizi Srl v Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile di Bologna. Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Article 3(1)(b) — Conditions for certification — Judgment in default — Concept of ‘uncontested claim’ — Procedural conduct of a party capable of constituting an ‘absence of contestation of the claim’. Case C-511/14. Case C-393/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 28 June 2021 — Lufthansa Technik AERO Alzey GmbH v Arik Air Limited and Others article 23 point (c) article 23 Case C-289/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tartu Maakohus (Estonia) lodged on 19 May 2017 — Collect Inkasso OÜ, ITM Inkasso OÜ, Bigbank AS v Rain Aint, Lauri Palm, Raiko Oikimus, Egle Noor, Artjom Konjarov article 6 paragraph 1 point (c) article 3 paragraph 1 point (b) article 17 point (a) article 17 article 18 paragraph 1 point (b) Case C-518/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Czech Republic) lodged on 7 August 2018 — RD v SC article 3 paragraph 1 point (b) Case C-484/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu (Croatia) lodged on 11 September 2015 — Ibrica Zulfikarpašić v Slaven Gajer Case C-66/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Poznań-Grunwald i Jeżyce w Poznaniu (Poland) lodged on 7 February 2017 — Grzegorz Chudaś and Irena Chudaś v DA Deutsche Allgemeine Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft AG article 7 article 4 point 1 Legal basis Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) Part Five: Institutions of the Community Title I: Provisions governing the institutions Chapter 2: Provisions common to several institutions Article 251 Article 189b - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) Part Three: Community policies Title IV: Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons Article 61 Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) Part Three: Community policies Title IV: Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons Article 67 EuroVoc Vocabulary Justice and home affairs Claim Commercial law Judicial cooperation Judicial cooperation in civil matters Approximation of laws