Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3676/91 of 17 December 1991 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2385/91 laying down detailed rules for certain special cases regarding the definition of sheepmeat and goatmeal producers and producer groups

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 3676/91 of 17 December 1991 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2385/91 laying down detailed rules for certain special cases regarding the definition of sheepmeat and goatmeal producers and producer groups

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89 of 25 September 1989 on the common organization of the market in sheepmeat and goatmeat (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1741/91 (2), and in particular Article 5 (9) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3493/90 of 27 November 1990 laying down general rules for the grant of premiums to sheepmeat and goatmeat producers (3), and in particular Articles 1 and 2 (4) thereof,

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 3493/90 lays down the definitions of sheepmeat and/or goatmeat producers and producer groups; whereas the Commission, acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 30 of Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89, has adopted, by Regulation (EEC) No 2385/91 (4), the rules for applying these definitions and in particular those relating to the limits laid down in Article 5 (7) of Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89 as regards producer groups and those relating to transhumanc in the geographical areas referred to in the second indent of Article 2 (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3493/90;

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 2385/91 lays down that producer groups are to determine a formula for apportioning the flock among their members and that, for subsequent marketing years, the formula will not be altered unless there is a substantial change in the membership of the group; whereas the provisions applicable to producer groups will be easier to apply and it will be possible to apply them in a more uniform manner if there is a definition of what is meant by a substantial change;

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 2385/91 also determines the cases in which group members cannot qualify pursuant to Article 5 (7) of Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89; whereas those cases should cover groups recognized as having been set up specifically to take improper advantage of those provisions;

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 2385/91 also lays down the conditions for qualifying for the special measures in respect of transhumance; whereas the monitoring difficulties involved make it desirable to specify the information to be contained in the attestations issued in this connection;

Whereas a further examination has shown that the list of geographical areas contained in the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 2385/91 should be extended;

Whereas the Management Committe for Sheep and Goats has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EEC) No 2385/91 is amended as follows:

1. The second subparagraph of Article 2 (2) is replaced by the following:

'However, where the nature of the group is such that ownership of individual animals cannot be assigned to each producer, the articles of association or the rules of procedure of the group must necessarily give a formula for apportioning the sheep and/or goat flock between the various producers concerned within the meaning of point 1 of the first paragraph of Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 3493/90.

That formula must correspond to the way the group's assets would be apportioned between the producer between the producer members were the group to be disbanded and shall be notified to the competent authority. This formula shall remain unaltered in subsequent marketing years unless the structure of the group which has been notified to the authority comptent for granting the premium undergoes a substantial change; such a change shall be the result of:

- new members joining or old members leaving, or

- a change of 10 % or more in the apportionment of the members' assets as a whole.

Annual premium applications must specify the number of ewes attributed to each producer on the basis of the said formula.'

2. Article 2 (3) (a) is replaced by the following:

'(a) producer members having an employer-employee relationship with another producer member or with the group;'.

3. The following paragraph 4 is added to Article 2:

'4. Producer groups may not include those set up after the entry into force of Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89 following the splitting-up of the flock of an existing holding, where applicable by applying the formula for apportionment referred to in Article 2 (2) where these have been created primarily to circumvent the individual limits laid down in Article 5 (7) of Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89.

Cases where the partners concerned can demonstrate a substantial change in the physical or financial structure of the holding which would on its own justify the creation of a producer group shall not be considered to fall within the preceding subparagraph.'

4. The following subparagrahs are added to Article 3 (3):

'Member States shall inform the Commission of the steps taken with regard to the designation or approval of the local authority competent to issue the attestations referred to in the first subparagraph.

The attestations must state:

- the place of transhumance,

- the dates of the transhumant animals' 'arrival and departure.'

5. Points IV and V of the Annex are replaced by points IV and V of the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Points 1 and 5 of Article 1 shall apply to applications submitted in respect of the 1991 marketing year. Point 3 of Article 1 shall apply to premium applications submitted in respect of the 1992 and subsequent marketing years. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 1991. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 289, 7. 10. 1989, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 163, 26. 6. 1991, p. 41. (3) OJ No L 337, 4. 12. 1990, p. 7. (4) OJ No L 219, 7. 8. 1991, p. 15.

ANNEX

IV. GERMANY Baden-Wuerttemberg (in the following urban and rural districts)

Stuttgart (town)

Boeblingen

Esslingen

Goeppingen

Ludwigsburg

Rems-Murr-Kreis

Heilbronn (town)

Heilbronn

Hohenlohekreis

Schwaebisch Hall

Main-Tauber-Kreis

Heidenheim

Ostalbkreis

Baden-Baden (town)

Rastatt

Karlsruhe (town)

Karlsruhe

Heidelberg (town)

Mannheim (town)

Sigmaringen

Rhein-Neckar-Kreis

Neckar-Odenwald-Kreis

Pforzheim (town)

Enzkreis

Calw

Freudenstadt

Freiburg im Breisgau (town)

Breisgau Hochschwarzwald

Emmendingen

Ortenaukreis

Konstanz

Loerrach

Waldshut

Reutlingen

Tuebingen

Zollernalbkreis

Ulm (town)

Alb-Donau-Kreis

Biberach

Bodenseekreis

Ravensburg Bavaria (in the following urban and rural districts)

Alchach-Friedberg

Altoetting

Ansbach (zone north-west)

Aschaffenburg

Augsburg

Bad Toelz-Wolfratshausen (zone north)

Berchtesgadener Land (zone north)

Dachau

Deggendorf

Dilligen

Dingolfing-Landau

Donau-Ries

Ebersberg

Eichstaett (south)

Erding

Erlangen (south)

Freising

Fuerstenfeldbruck

Fuerth

Guenzburg

Kelheim

Kitzingen

Landsberg/Lech

Landshut

Lindau (west)

Main-Spessart (south)

Miesbach (zone north)

Miltenberg

Muehldorf

Munich

Neuburg-Schrobenhausen

Neustadt/Aisch - Bad Windsheim (west)

Neu Ulm

Nuernberger Land (west)

Ostallgaeu (zone north)

Passau (zone south-west)

Pfaffenhofen

Regensburg

Rosenheim (zone north)

Rottal-Inn

Starnberg

Straubing-Bogen

Schweinfurt

Traunstein (zone north)

Unterallgaeu

Wuerzburg Hesse (in the following urban and rural districts)

Wetteraukreis

Giessen

Marburg-Biedenkopf Fulda

Kassel

Limburg-Weilburg

Lower Saxony (in the following urban and rural districts)

Gifhorn

Goettingen

Peine

Hanover

Hildesheim

Holzminden Hamelin

Nienburg

Schaumburg

Uelzen

Verden

Rhineland-Palatinate (in the following rural districts and towns)

Koblenz

Ahrweiler

Bad Kreuznach

Cochem-Zell

Mayen-Koblenz

Neuwied

Rhein-Lahn-Kreis

Trier

Bernkastel-Wittlich

Trier-Saarburg

Frankenthal

Kaiserslautern (town and rural district)

Landau i.d. Pfalz Ludwigshafen (town and rural district)

Mainz

Neustadt a.d.W.

Speyer

Worms

Zweibruecken

Alzey-Worms

Bad-Duerkheim

Germersheim

Suedliche Weinstrasse

Mainz-Bingen

Pirmasens

Donnersbergkreis

V. ITALY Non-less-favoured areas of the regions

Tuscany

Umbria

Marche

Sicily

Sardinia

Lazio Abbruzzo

Molise

Campania

Basilicata

Puglia

Calabria

Non-less-favoured areas of the provinces

Cuneo

Vercelli

Bergamo

Brescia

Treviso Pavia

Parma

Reggio Emilia

Modena

Bologna

Forlì