Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1927 of 11 October 2022 establishing measures for the containment of Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance) within certain demarcated areas
Modified by
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/589of 20 February 2024amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1927 as regards the list of demarcated areas for containment of Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance), 32024R0589, February 21, 2024
(1) "the specified pest" means Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance);(2) "the specified plants" means plants for planting of Citrus L.,Fortunella Swingle,Poncirus Raf., and their hybrids,Ceratonia siliqua L.,Cercis siliquastrum L.,Clematis vitalba L.,Cotoneaster Medik.,Crategus L.,Cydonia oblonga L.,Diospyros kaki L.,Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.,Ficus carica L.,Hedera L.,Magnolia L.,Malus Mill.,Melia L.,Mespilus germanica L.,Myrtus communis L.,Parthenocissus Planch.,Photinia Lindley.,Prunus cerasus L.,Prunus laurocerasus L.,Psidium guajava L.,Punica granatum L.,Pyracantha M. Roem.,Pyrus L.,Rosa L.,Vitis L.,Wisteria Nutt., other than seeds, pollen and plants in tissue culture;(3) "the demarcated area for containment" means an area listed in Annex I, where the specified pest cannot be eradicated; (4) "the pest survey card" means the publication "Pest survey card on Aleurocanthus spiniferus andAleurocanthus woglumi " of the European Food Safety Authority .EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2019. Pest survey card on Aleurocanthus spiniferus andAleurocanthus woglumi . EFSA supporting publication 2019:EN-1565. 17pp. doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.EN-1565. Available online: https://arcg.is/u5DTL
(a) biological control, such as parasitoids, of the specified pest; (b) appropriate treatments against the specified pest; (c) pruning and destruction of the parts of the specified plants infested with the specified pest, after the application of the treatments provided for in point (b); (d) trapping of the specified pest, and, if the specified pest is detected, application of appropriate treatments.
(a) visual examinations, at appropriate times, to detect the specified pest or its symptoms; (b) trapping; (c) sampling and testing, in the case of plants showing symptoms of, or suspected infestation by, the specified pest.
(a) Article 5(2) of this Regulation, using one of the templates set out in Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1231; (b) Article 5(3) of this Regulation, using one of the templates set out in Annex II to this Regulation.
Number of demarcated area (DA) | Zone of DA | Region | Municipalities or other administrative/geographic delimitations |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Infested zone | Regional Unit of Thesprotia | Igoumenitsas, Souliou, Filiaton |
Buffer zone | Regional Unit of Ioannina | Zitsas, Dodonis, Pogoniou | |
2. | Infested zone | Regional Unit of Preveza | Zirou, Pargas, Prevezas |
Buffer zone | Regional Unit of Ioannina | Dodonis, | |
3. | Infested zone | Regional Unit of Arta | Artaion, Nikolaou Skoufa |
Buffer zone | Regional Unit of Arta | Georgiou Karaiskaki, Kentrikon Tzoumerkon | |
4. | Infested zone | Regional Unit of Aitoloakarnania | Navpaktias, Thermou, Xiromerou, Aktiou – Vonitsas, Amfilohias, Mesologgiou, Agriniou |
Buffer zone | Regional Unit of Fokida | Doridos | |
Regional Unit of Evritania | Karpenisiou, Agrafon | ||
5. | Infested zone | Ionian Islands | Corfu |
Number of demarcated area (DA) | Zone of DA | Region | Municipalities or other administrative/geographic delimitations |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Infested zone | Occitanie | Aigues-Vives, Aimargues, Aubais, Aubord, Beauvoisin, Bernis, Boissières, Bouillargues, Caissargues, Calvisson, Caveirac, Codognan, Congénies, Gallargues-le-Montueux, Générac, Junas, La Calmette, Langlade, Lansargues, Le Cailar, Lunel, Lunel-Viel, Marsillargues, Milhaud, Mus, Nages-et-Solorgues, Nîmes, Rodilhan, Saint-Dionisy, Saint-Gilles, Saint-Hilaire-de-Beauvoir, Saint-Just, Saint-Laurent-d’Aigouze, Saint-Nazaire-de-Pézan, Saint-Sériès, Saturargues, Sommières, Uchaud, Valergues, Vauvert, Vergèze, Vestric-et-Candiac, Villetelle |
Buffer zone | Occitanie | Aigues-Mortes, Aspères, Aujargues, Baillargues, Bellegarde, Boisseron, Cabrières, Campagne, Candillargues, Castries, Clarensac, Dions, Entre-Vignes, Fontanès, Fourques, Gajan, Galargues, Garons, La Grande-Motte, La Rouvière, Le Grau-du-Roi, Manduel, Marguerittes, Mauguio, Montignargues, Montpezat, Moussac, Mudaison, Parignargues, Poulx, Saint-Brès, Saint-Chaptes, Saint-Côme-et-Maruéjols, Sainte-Anastasie, Saint-Geniès-de-Malgoirès, Saint-Geniès-des-Mourgues, Salinelles, Sanilhac-Sagriès, Saussines, Sauzet, Souvignargues, Villevieille | |
Provence Alpes Côte d’Azur | Arles, Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer |
Number of demarcated area (DA) | Zone of DA | Region | Municipalities or other administrative/geographic delimitations | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Infested zone | Dubrovnik Neretva County | Konavle | Vitaljina, Gruda, Đurinići, Palje Brdo, Ljuta, Lovorno, Zastolje |
Dubrovačko Primorje | Slano | |||
Grad Dubrovnik | Zaton | |||
Opuzen | Opuzen I., Opuzen II. | |||
Ploče | Komin | |||
Buffer zone | Dubrovnik Neretva County | Konavle | Pločice, Poljice, Vodovađa, Dubravka, Dunave, Popovići, Komaji, Pridvorje, Radovčići, Kuna Konavoska | |
Grad Dubrovnik | Grad Dubrovnik, Obuljeno, Sustjepan, Petrovo Selo, Osojnik, Orašac, Gromača, Ljubač | |||
Dubrovačko Primorje | Majkovi Donji, Majkovi Gornji, Banići, Trnova, Mravinjica | |||
Ploče | Baćina, Plina, Ploče, Rogotin | |||
Kula Norinska | Desne, Metković, Krvavac II. | |||
Zažablje | Vidonje | |||
Opuzen | Opuzen | |||
Slivno | Slivno, Komarna-Duboka, Klek, Pižinovac-Lovorje, Vlaka-Tuštevac, Mihalj-Otok-Lučina, Blace-Trn | |||
2. | Infested zone | Split Dalmatia County | Jelsa | Jelsa, Vrisnik, Pitve, Svirče, Vrboska |
Milna | Milna | |||
Sutivan | Sutivan | |||
Bobovišća | Bobovišća | |||
Supetar | Mirca, Supetar | |||
Sućuraj | Bogomolje | |||
Starigrad | Stari Grad | |||
Postira | Dol | |||
Hvar | Hvar | |||
Podgora | Podgora | |||
Tučepi | Tučepi | |||
Baška Voda | Baška Voda | |||
Brela | Brela | |||
Makarska | Makarska | |||
Buffer zone | Split Dalmatia County | Marina | Marina, Blizna, Mitlo Vinovac, Račice, Sevid | |
Šolta | Gornje Selo | |||
Nerežišća | Dračevica, Donji Humac, Nerežišća | |||
Supetar | Splitska, Škrip | |||
Hvar | Brusje, Grablje | |||
Vrbanj | Vrbanj | |||
Jelsa | Zastražišće, Gdinj | |||
Sućuraj | Sućuraj | |||
Omiš | Rogoznica, Slime | |||
Šestanovac | Žeževica, Grabovac | |||
Zagvozd | Zagvozd, Župa | |||
Makarska | Veliko Brdo, Kotišina | |||
Vrgorac | Rašćane, Kozica | |||
Podgora | Igrane, Drašnice | |||
3. | Infested zone | Šibenik Knin County | Rogoznica | Rogoznica |
Buffer zone | Šibenik Knin County | Primošten | Primošten | |
Marina | Račice, Sevid | |||
4. | Infested zone | Primorje Gorski Kotar County | Punat | Punat |
Buffer zone | Primorje Gorski Kotar County | Punat | Stara Baška | |
Baška | Batomalj, Draga Bašćanska | |||
Vrbnik | Vrbnik | |||
Krk | Kornić, Krk |
Number of Demarcated Area (DA) | Zone of DA | Region | Municipalities or other administrative/geographic delimitations |
---|---|---|---|
Infested zone | Marche | ||
Buffer zone | Marche | ||
Abruzzo | |||
Infested zone | Lazio | ||
Buffer zone | Lazio | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Roma | |
Infested zone | Campania | Whole municipalities of Afragola, Agropoli, Aversa, Caivano, Capua, Cardito, Casagiove, Casalvelino, Casoria, Castellabate, Cava dei Tirreni, Crispano, Ercolano, Falciano del Massico, Forchia, Forio, Francolise, Frattamaggiore, Frattaminore, Giugliano in Campania, Maddaloni, Marcianise, Massa Lubrense, Napoli, Nocera Inferiore, Nocera Superiore, Nola, Ottaviano, Palma Campania, Piana di Monte Verna, Pontecagnano Faiano, Portici, Quarto, Salerno, San Gennaro Vesuviano, San Giuseppe Vesuviano, San Paolo Belsito, San Salvatore Telesino and Saviano. | |
Buffer zone | Campania | Whole provinces of Benevento, Caserta, Napoli e Salerno. | |
Infested zone | Sicilia |
| |
Buffer zone | Sicilia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Catania. | |
Infested zone | Sicilia |
| |
Buffer zone | Sicilia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Caltagirone and Grammichele. | |
Infested zone | Sicilia |
| |
Buffer zone | Sicilia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Siracusa. | |
Infested zone | Sicilia |
| |
Buffer zone | Sicilia | 2 km around the infested zone of the municipality of Grammichele, falling in part of the municipalities of Grammichele, Mineo, Caltagirone and Licodia Eubea. | |
Infested zone | Sicilia |
| |
Buffer zone | Sicilia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Palermo. | |
Infested zone | Emilia-Romagna |
| |
Buffer zone | Emilia-Romagna | ||
Infested zone | Emilia-Romagna |
| |
Buffer zone | Emilia-Romagna | ||
Infested zone | Emilia-Romagna | ||
Buffer zone | Emilia-Romagna | ||
Infested zone | Lombardia | Whole territory of the municipality of Carpenedolo. | |
Buffer zone | Lombardia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the following municipalities: Calvisano, Montichiari, Acquafredda. | |
Infested zone | Lombardia | Whole territory of the municipality of Castel Goffredo | |
Buffer zone | Lombardia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the following municipalities: Casaloldo, Castiglione delle Stiviere, Ceresara, Guidizzolo, Medole, Casalmoro, Asola. | |
Infested zone | Lombardia | Whole territory of the municipalities of Schivenoglia, San Giacomo delle Segnate, Quistello, Borgocarbonara, Sermide and Felonica. | |
Buffer zone | Lombardia | ||
Infested zone | Lombardia | Whole territory of the municipalities of Bergamo, Azzano San Paolo, Orio al Serio and Zanica. | |
Buffer zone | Lombardia | ||
Infested zone | Lombardia | Whole territory of the municipality of San Colombano al Lambro. | |
Buffer zone | Lombardia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the following municipalities: Borghetto Lodigiano, Livraga, Graffignana, Orio Litta, Chignolo Po, Miradolo Terme. | |
Infested zone | Lombardia | Whole territory of the municipality of Pantigliate. | |
Buffer zone | Lombardia | ||
Infested zone | Liguria |
| |
Buffer zone | Liguria | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Arenzano and Cogoleto. | |
Infested zone | Liguria |
| |
Buffer zone | Liguria | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Ameglia, Castelnuovo Magra, Luni and Sarzana. | |
Toscana | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Carrara and Fosdinovo. | ||
Infested zone | Liguria |
| |
Buffer zone | Liguria | 2 Km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Levanto, Bonassola and Monterosso al mare. | |
Infested zone | Abruzzo |
| |
Buffer zone | Abruzzo | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Martinsicuro. | |
Infested zone | Abruzzo |
| |
Buffer zone | Abruzzo | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Cepagatti. | |
Infested zone | Abruzzo |
| |
Buffer zone | Abruzzo | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Tortoreto. | |
Infested zone | Abruzzo |
| |
Buffer zone | Abruzzo | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Chieti. | |
Infested zone | Basilicata |
| |
Buffer zone | Basilicata | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Tursi, Stigliano, Montalbano jonico, Pisticci, Montescaglioso, Bernalda, Scanzano Jonico, Policoro and Rotondella. | |
Puglia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Ginosa. | ||
Infested zone | Toscana |
| |
Buffer zone | Toscana | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Prato, Calenzano and Campi Bisenzio. | |
Infested zone | Toscana |
| |
Buffer zone | Toscana | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Castagneto Carducci. | |
Infested zone | Toscana |
| |
Buffer zone | Toscana | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Firenze. | |
Infested zone | Toscana |
| |
Buffer zone | Toscana | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Monte Argentario and Orbetello. | |
Infested zone | Toscana |
| |
Buffer zone | Toscana | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Carrara. |
For column 1: | Indicate the name of the geographical area, outbreak number or any information that allows identification of this demarcated area (DA) and the date when it was established. |
For column 2: | Indicate the size of the DA before the start of the survey. |
For column 3: | Indicate the size of the DA after the survey. |
For column 4: | Indicate the approach: Containment. Please, include as many rows as necessary, depending on the number of DA per pest and the approaches these areas are subject to. |
For column 5: | Indicate the zone of the DA where the survey was carried out, including as many rows as necessary: Infested zone (IZ) or buffer zone (BZ), using separate rows. When applicable, indicate the area of the BZ where the survey was carried out (e.g. last 20 km adjacent to the IZ, around nurseries, etc.) in different rows. |
For column 6: |
|
For column 7: | Indicate which are the risk areas identified based on the biology of the pest, presence of host plants, eco-climatic conditions and risk locations. |
For column 8: | Indicate the risk areas included in the survey, from those identified in column 7. |
For column 9: | Indicate plants, fruits, seeds, soil, packaging material, wood, machinery, vehicles, water, other, specifying the specific case. |
For column 10: | Indicate the list of plant species/genera surveyed, using one row per plant species/genera. |
For column 11: | Indicate the months of the year when the survey was carried out. |
For column 12: | Indicate the details of the survey, depending on the specific legal requirements of each pest. Indicate with N/A when the information of certain column is not applicable. |
For columns 13 and 14: | Indicate the results, if applicable, providing the information available in the corresponding columns. "Undetermined" are those analysed samples for which no result was obtained due to different factors (e.g. below detection level, unprocessed sample-not identified, old). |
For column 15: | Indicate the outbreak notifications of the year when the survey took place for findings in the BZ. The outbreak notification number does not need to be included when the competent authority has decided that the finding is one of the cases referred to in Article 14(2), Article 15(2) or Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031. In that case, indicate the reason for not providing this information in column 16 ("Comments"). |
the target population, epidemiological unit and inspection units, the detection method and method sensitivity, the risk factor(s), indicating the risk levels and corresponding relative risks and proportions of host plant population.
For column 1: | Indicate the name of the geographical area, outbreak number or any information that allows identification of this demarcated area (DA) and the date when it was established. |
For column 2: | Indicate the size of the DA before the start of the survey. |
For column 3: | Indicate the size of the DA after the survey. |
For column 4: | Indicate the approach: Containment. Please, include as many rows as necessary, depending on the number of DA per pest and the approaches these areas are subject to. |
For column 5: | Indicate the zone of the DA where the survey was carried out, including as many rows as necessary: Infested zone (IZ) or buffer zone (BZ), using separate rows. When applicable, indicate the area of the BZ where the survey was carried out (e.g. last 20 km adjacent to the IZ, around nurseries, etc.) in different rows. |
For column 6: |
|
For column 7: | Indicate the months of the year when the surveys were carried out. |
For column 8: | Indicate the chosen target population providing accordingly the list of host species/genera and area covered. The target population is defined as the ensemble of inspection units. Its size is defined typically for agricultural areas as hectares, but could be lots, fields, greenhouses, etc. Please justify the choice made in the underlying assumptions. Indicate the inspection units surveyed. "Inspection unit" means plants, plant parts, commodities, materials, pest vectors that had been scrutinised for identifying and detecting the pests. |
For column 9: | Indicate the epidemiological units surveyed, indicating their description and unit of measurement. "Epidemiological unit" means a homogeneous area where the interactions between the pest, the host plants and the abiotic and biotic factors and conditions would result into the same epidemiology, should the pest be present. The epidemiological units are a subdivision of the target population that are homogenous in terms of epidemiology with at least one host plant. In some cases the whole host population in a region/area/country may be defined as epidemiological unit. They could be Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) regions, urban areas, forests, rose gardens or farms, or hectares. The choice shall be justified in the underlying assumptions. |
For column 10: | Indicate the methods used during the survey including the number of activities in each case, depending on the specific legal requirements of each pest. Indicate with N/A when the information of certain column is not available. |
For column 11: | Indicate an estimation of the sampling effectiveness. Sampling effectiveness means the probability of selecting infected plant parts from an infected plant. For vectors, it is the effectiveness of the method to capture a positive vector when it is present in the survey area. For soil, it is the effectiveness of selecting a soil sample containing the pest when the pest is present in the survey area. |
For column 12: | "Method sensitivity" means the probability of a method to correctly detect pest presence. The method sensitivity is defined as the probability that a truly positive host tests positive. It is the multiplication of the sampling effectiveness (i.e. probability of selecting infected plant parts from an infected plant) by the diagnostic sensitivity (characterised by the visual inspection and/or laboratory test used in the identification process). |
For column 13: | Provide the risk factors in different rows, using as many rows as necessary. For each risk factor indicate the risk level and corresponding relative risk and proportion of host population. |
For column B: | Indicate the details of the survey, depending on the specific legal requirements for each pest. Indicate with N/A when the information of certain column is not applicable. The information to be provided in these columns is related to the information included in the column 10 "Detection methods". |
For column 18: | Indicate the number of trapping sites in case this number differs from the number of traps (Column 17) (e.g. the same trap is used in different places). |
For column 21: | Indicate the number of samples found positive, negative or undetermined. "Undetermined" are those analysed samples for which no result was obtained due to different factors (e.g. below detection level, unprocessed sample-not identified, old, etc.). |
For column 22: | Indicate the outbreak notifications of the year when the survey took place for findings in the buffer zone. The outbreak notification number does not need to be included when the competent authority has decided that the finding is one of the cases referred to in Articles 14(2), 15(2) or 16 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031. In this case, please indicate the reason for not providing this information in column 25 ("Comments"). |
For column 23: | Indicate the sensitivity of the survey, as defined in International Standard for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM 31). This value of the achieved confidence level of pest freedom is calculated based on the examinations (and/or samples) performed given the method sensitivity and the design prevalence. |
For column 24: | Indicate the design prevalence based on a pre-survey estimate of the likely actual prevalence of the pest in the field. The design prevalence is set as a goal of the survey and corresponds to the compromise the risk managers are making between the risk of having the pest and the resources available for the survey. Typically, for a detection survey a value of 1 % is set |
(1) "the specified pest" means Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance);(2) "the specified plants" means plants for planting of Citrus L.,Fortunella Swingle,Poncirus Raf., and their hybrids,Ceratonia siliqua L.,Cercis siliquastrum L.,Clematis vitalba L.,Cotoneaster Medik.,Crategus L.,Cydonia oblonga L.,Diospyros kaki L.,Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.,Ficus carica L.,Hedera L.,Magnolia L.,Malus Mill.,Melia L.,Mespilus germanica L.,Myrtus communis L.,Parthenocissus Planch.,Photinia Lindley.,Prunus cerasus L.,Prunus laurocerasus L.,Psidium guajava L.,Punica granatum L.,Pyracantha M. Roem.,Pyrus L.,Rosa L.,Vitis L.,Wisteria Nutt., other than seeds, pollen and plants in tissue culture;(3) "the demarcated area for containment" means an area listed in Annex I, where the specified pest cannot be eradicated; (4) "the pest survey card" means the publication "Pest survey card on Aleurocanthus spiniferus andAleurocanthus woglumi " of the European Food Safety Authority .EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2019. Pest survey card on Aleurocanthus spiniferus andAleurocanthus woglumi . EFSA supporting publication 2019:EN-1565. 17pp. doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.EN-1565. Available online: https://arcg.is/u5DTL
(a) biological control, such as parasitoids, of the specified pest; (b) appropriate treatments against the specified pest; (c) pruning and destruction of the parts of the specified plants infested with the specified pest, after the application of the treatments provided for in point (b); (d) trapping of the specified pest, and, if the specified pest is detected, application of appropriate treatments.
(a) visual examinations, at appropriate times, to detect the specified pest or its symptoms; (b) trapping; (c) sampling and testing, in the case of plants showing symptoms of, or suspected infestation by, the specified pest.
(a) Article 5(2) of this Regulation, using one of the templates set out in Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1231; (b) Article 5(3) of this Regulation, using one of the templates set out in Annex II to this Regulation.
Number of demarcated area (DA) | Zone of DA | Region | Municipalities or other administrative/geographic delimitations |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Infested zone | Regional Unit of Thesprotia | Igoumenitsas, Souliou, Filiaton |
Buffer zone | Regional Unit of Ioannina | Zitsas, Dodonis, Pogoniou | |
2. | Infested zone | Regional Unit of Preveza | Zirou, Pargas, Prevezas |
Buffer zone | Regional Unit of Ioannina | Dodonis, | |
3. | Infested zone | Regional Unit of Arta | Artaion, Nikolaou Skoufa |
Buffer zone | Regional Unit of Arta | Georgiou Karaiskaki, Kentrikon Tzoumerkon | |
4. | Infested zone | Regional Unit of Aitoloakarnania | Navpaktias, Thermou, Xiromerou, Aktiou – Vonitsas, Amfilohias, Mesologgiou, Agriniou |
Buffer zone | Regional Unit of Fokida | Doridos | |
Regional Unit of Evritania | Karpenisiou, Agrafon | ||
5. | Infested zone | Ionian Islands | Corfu |
Number of demarcated area (DA) | Zone of DA | Region | Municipalities or other administrative/geographic delimitations |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Infested zone | Occitanie | Aigues-Vives, Aimargues, Aubais, Aubord, Beauvoisin, Bernis, Boissières, Bouillargues, Caissargues, Calvisson, Caveirac, Codognan, Congénies, Gallargues-le-Montueux, Générac, Junas, La Calmette, Langlade, Lansargues, Le Cailar, Lunel, Lunel-Viel, Marsillargues, Milhaud, Mus, Nages-et-Solorgues, Nîmes, Rodilhan, Saint-Dionisy, Saint-Gilles, Saint-Hilaire-de-Beauvoir, Saint-Just, Saint-Laurent-d’Aigouze, Saint-Nazaire-de-Pézan, Saint-Sériès, Saturargues, Sommières, Uchaud, Valergues, Vauvert, Vergèze, Vestric-et-Candiac, Villetelle |
Buffer zone | Occitanie | Aigues-Mortes, Aspères, Aujargues, Baillargues, Bellegarde, Boisseron, Cabrières, Campagne, Candillargues, Castries, Clarensac, Dions, Entre-Vignes, Fontanès, Fourques, Gajan, Galargues, Garons, La Grande-Motte, La Rouvière, Le Grau-du-Roi, Manduel, Marguerittes, Mauguio, Montignargues, Montpezat, Moussac, Mudaison, Parignargues, Poulx, Saint-Brès, Saint-Chaptes, Saint-Côme-et-Maruéjols, Sainte-Anastasie, Saint-Geniès-de-Malgoirès, Saint-Geniès-des-Mourgues, Salinelles, Sanilhac-Sagriès, Saussines, Sauzet, Souvignargues, Villevieille | |
Provence Alpes Côte d’Azur | Arles, Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer |
Number of demarcated area (DA) | Zone of DA | Region | Municipalities or other administrative/geographic delimitations | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Infested zone | Dubrovnik Neretva County | Konavle | Vitaljina, Gruda, Đurinići, Palje Brdo, Ljuta, Lovorno, Zastolje |
Dubrovačko Primorje | Slano | |||
Grad Dubrovnik | Zaton | |||
Opuzen | Opuzen I., Opuzen II. | |||
Ploče | Komin | |||
Buffer zone | Dubrovnik Neretva County | Konavle | Pločice, Poljice, Vodovađa, Dubravka, Dunave, Popovići, Komaji, Pridvorje, Radovčići, Kuna Konavoska | |
Grad Dubrovnik | Grad Dubrovnik, Obuljeno, Sustjepan, Petrovo Selo, Osojnik, Orašac, Gromača, Ljubač | |||
Dubrovačko Primorje | Majkovi Donji, Majkovi Gornji, Banići, Trnova, Mravinjica | |||
Ploče | Baćina, Plina, Ploče, Rogotin | |||
Kula Norinska | Desne, Metković, Krvavac II. | |||
Zažablje | Vidonje | |||
Opuzen | Opuzen | |||
Slivno | Slivno, Komarna-Duboka, Klek, Pižinovac-Lovorje, Vlaka-Tuštevac, Mihalj-Otok-Lučina, Blace-Trn | |||
2. | Infested zone | Split Dalmatia County | Jelsa | Jelsa, Vrisnik, Pitve, Svirče, Vrboska |
Milna | Milna | |||
Sutivan | Sutivan | |||
Bobovišća | Bobovišća | |||
Supetar | Mirca, Supetar | |||
Sućuraj | Bogomolje | |||
Starigrad | Stari Grad | |||
Postira | Dol | |||
Hvar | Hvar | |||
Podgora | Podgora | |||
Tučepi | Tučepi | |||
Baška Voda | Baška Voda | |||
Brela | Brela | |||
Makarska | Makarska | |||
Buffer zone | Split Dalmatia County | Marina | Marina, Blizna, Mitlo Vinovac, Račice, Sevid | |
Šolta | Gornje Selo | |||
Nerežišća | Dračevica, Donji Humac, Nerežišća | |||
Supetar | Splitska, Škrip | |||
Hvar | Brusje, Grablje | |||
Vrbanj | Vrbanj | |||
Jelsa | Zastražišće, Gdinj | |||
Sućuraj | Sućuraj | |||
Omiš | Rogoznica, Slime | |||
Šestanovac | Žeževica, Grabovac | |||
Zagvozd | Zagvozd, Župa | |||
Makarska | Veliko Brdo, Kotišina | |||
Vrgorac | Rašćane, Kozica | |||
Podgora | Igrane, Drašnice | |||
3. | Infested zone | Šibenik Knin County | Rogoznica | Rogoznica |
Buffer zone | Šibenik Knin County | Primošten | Primošten | |
Marina | Račice, Sevid | |||
4. | Infested zone | Primorje Gorski Kotar County | Punat | Punat |
Buffer zone | Primorje Gorski Kotar County | Punat | Stara Baška | |
Baška | Batomalj, Draga Bašćanska | |||
Vrbnik | Vrbnik | |||
Krk | Kornić, Krk |
Number of Demarcated Area (DA) | Zone of DA | Region | Municipalities or other administrative/geographic delimitations |
---|---|---|---|
Infested zone | Marche | ||
Buffer zone | Marche | ||
Abruzzo | |||
Infested zone | Lazio | ||
Buffer zone | Lazio | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Roma | |
Infested zone | Campania | Whole municipalities of Afragola, Agropoli, Aversa, Caivano, Capua, Cardito, Casagiove, Casalvelino, Casoria, Castellabate, Cava dei Tirreni, Crispano, Ercolano, Falciano del Massico, Forchia, Forio, Francolise, Frattamaggiore, Frattaminore, Giugliano in Campania, Maddaloni, Marcianise, Massa Lubrense, Napoli, Nocera Inferiore, Nocera Superiore, Nola, Ottaviano, Palma Campania, Piana di Monte Verna, Pontecagnano Faiano, Portici, Quarto, Salerno, San Gennaro Vesuviano, San Giuseppe Vesuviano, San Paolo Belsito, San Salvatore Telesino and Saviano. | |
Buffer zone | Campania | Whole provinces of Benevento, Caserta, Napoli e Salerno. | |
Infested zone | Sicilia |
| |
Buffer zone | Sicilia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Catania. | |
Infested zone | Sicilia |
| |
Buffer zone | Sicilia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Caltagirone and Grammichele. | |
Infested zone | Sicilia |
| |
Buffer zone | Sicilia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Siracusa. | |
Infested zone | Sicilia |
| |
Buffer zone | Sicilia | 2 km around the infested zone of the municipality of Grammichele, falling in part of the municipalities of Grammichele, Mineo, Caltagirone and Licodia Eubea. | |
Infested zone | Sicilia |
| |
Buffer zone | Sicilia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Palermo. | |
Infested zone | Emilia-Romagna |
| |
Buffer zone | Emilia-Romagna | ||
Infested zone | Emilia-Romagna |
| |
Buffer zone | Emilia-Romagna | ||
Infested zone | Emilia-Romagna | ||
Buffer zone | Emilia-Romagna | ||
Infested zone | Lombardia | Whole territory of the municipality of Carpenedolo. | |
Buffer zone | Lombardia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the following municipalities: Calvisano, Montichiari, Acquafredda. | |
Infested zone | Lombardia | Whole territory of the municipality of Castel Goffredo | |
Buffer zone | Lombardia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the following municipalities: Casaloldo, Castiglione delle Stiviere, Ceresara, Guidizzolo, Medole, Casalmoro, Asola. | |
Infested zone | Lombardia | Whole territory of the municipalities of Schivenoglia, San Giacomo delle Segnate, Quistello, Borgocarbonara, Sermide and Felonica. | |
Buffer zone | Lombardia | ||
Infested zone | Lombardia | Whole territory of the municipalities of Bergamo, Azzano San Paolo, Orio al Serio and Zanica. | |
Buffer zone | Lombardia | ||
Infested zone | Lombardia | Whole territory of the municipality of San Colombano al Lambro. | |
Buffer zone | Lombardia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the following municipalities: Borghetto Lodigiano, Livraga, Graffignana, Orio Litta, Chignolo Po, Miradolo Terme. | |
Infested zone | Lombardia | Whole territory of the municipality of Pantigliate. | |
Buffer zone | Lombardia | ||
Infested zone | Liguria |
| |
Buffer zone | Liguria | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Arenzano and Cogoleto. | |
Infested zone | Liguria |
| |
Buffer zone | Liguria | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Ameglia, Castelnuovo Magra, Luni and Sarzana. | |
Toscana | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Carrara and Fosdinovo. | ||
Infested zone | Liguria |
| |
Buffer zone | Liguria | 2 Km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Levanto, Bonassola and Monterosso al mare. | |
Infested zone | Abruzzo |
| |
Buffer zone | Abruzzo | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Martinsicuro. | |
Infested zone | Abruzzo |
| |
Buffer zone | Abruzzo | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Cepagatti. | |
Infested zone | Abruzzo |
| |
Buffer zone | Abruzzo | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Tortoreto. | |
Infested zone | Abruzzo |
| |
Buffer zone | Abruzzo | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Chieti. | |
Infested zone | Basilicata |
| |
Buffer zone | Basilicata | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Tursi, Stigliano, Montalbano jonico, Pisticci, Montescaglioso, Bernalda, Scanzano Jonico, Policoro and Rotondella. | |
Puglia | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Ginosa. | ||
Infested zone | Toscana |
| |
Buffer zone | Toscana | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Prato, Calenzano and Campi Bisenzio. | |
Infested zone | Toscana |
| |
Buffer zone | Toscana | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Castagneto Carducci. | |
Infested zone | Toscana |
| |
Buffer zone | Toscana | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Firenze. | |
Infested zone | Toscana |
| |
Buffer zone | Toscana | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipalities of Monte Argentario and Orbetello. | |
Infested zone | Toscana |
| |
Buffer zone | Toscana | 2 km around the infested zone falling in part of the municipality of Carrara. |
For column 1: | Indicate the name of the geographical area, outbreak number or any information that allows identification of this demarcated area (DA) and the date when it was established. |
For column 2: | Indicate the size of the DA before the start of the survey. |
For column 3: | Indicate the size of the DA after the survey. |
For column 4: | Indicate the approach: Containment. Please, include as many rows as necessary, depending on the number of DA per pest and the approaches these areas are subject to. |
For column 5: | Indicate the zone of the DA where the survey was carried out, including as many rows as necessary: Infested zone (IZ) or buffer zone (BZ), using separate rows. When applicable, indicate the area of the BZ where the survey was carried out (e.g. last 20 km adjacent to the IZ, around nurseries, etc.) in different rows. |
For column 6: |
|
For column 7: | Indicate which are the risk areas identified based on the biology of the pest, presence of host plants, eco-climatic conditions and risk locations. |
For column 8: | Indicate the risk areas included in the survey, from those identified in column 7. |
For column 9: | Indicate plants, fruits, seeds, soil, packaging material, wood, machinery, vehicles, water, other, specifying the specific case. |
For column 10: | Indicate the list of plant species/genera surveyed, using one row per plant species/genera. |
For column 11: | Indicate the months of the year when the survey was carried out. |
For column 12: | Indicate the details of the survey, depending on the specific legal requirements of each pest. Indicate with N/A when the information of certain column is not applicable. |
For columns 13 and 14: | Indicate the results, if applicable, providing the information available in the corresponding columns. "Undetermined" are those analysed samples for which no result was obtained due to different factors (e.g. below detection level, unprocessed sample-not identified, old). |
For column 15: | Indicate the outbreak notifications of the year when the survey took place for findings in the BZ. The outbreak notification number does not need to be included when the competent authority has decided that the finding is one of the cases referred to in Article 14(2), Article 15(2) or Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031. In that case, indicate the reason for not providing this information in column 16 ("Comments"). |
the target population, epidemiological unit and inspection units, the detection method and method sensitivity, the risk factor(s), indicating the risk levels and corresponding relative risks and proportions of host plant population.
For column 1: | Indicate the name of the geographical area, outbreak number or any information that allows identification of this demarcated area (DA) and the date when it was established. |
For column 2: | Indicate the size of the DA before the start of the survey. |
For column 3: | Indicate the size of the DA after the survey. |
For column 4: | Indicate the approach: Containment. Please, include as many rows as necessary, depending on the number of DA per pest and the approaches these areas are subject to. |
For column 5: | Indicate the zone of the DA where the survey was carried out, including as many rows as necessary: Infested zone (IZ) or buffer zone (BZ), using separate rows. When applicable, indicate the area of the BZ where the survey was carried out (e.g. last 20 km adjacent to the IZ, around nurseries, etc.) in different rows. |
For column 6: |
|
For column 7: | Indicate the months of the year when the surveys were carried out. |
For column 8: | Indicate the chosen target population providing accordingly the list of host species/genera and area covered. The target population is defined as the ensemble of inspection units. Its size is defined typically for agricultural areas as hectares, but could be lots, fields, greenhouses, etc. Please justify the choice made in the underlying assumptions. Indicate the inspection units surveyed. "Inspection unit" means plants, plant parts, commodities, materials, pest vectors that had been scrutinised for identifying and detecting the pests. |
For column 9: | Indicate the epidemiological units surveyed, indicating their description and unit of measurement. "Epidemiological unit" means a homogeneous area where the interactions between the pest, the host plants and the abiotic and biotic factors and conditions would result into the same epidemiology, should the pest be present. The epidemiological units are a subdivision of the target population that are homogenous in terms of epidemiology with at least one host plant. In some cases the whole host population in a region/area/country may be defined as epidemiological unit. They could be Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) regions, urban areas, forests, rose gardens or farms, or hectares. The choice shall be justified in the underlying assumptions. |
For column 10: | Indicate the methods used during the survey including the number of activities in each case, depending on the specific legal requirements of each pest. Indicate with N/A when the information of certain column is not available. |
For column 11: | Indicate an estimation of the sampling effectiveness. Sampling effectiveness means the probability of selecting infected plant parts from an infected plant. For vectors, it is the effectiveness of the method to capture a positive vector when it is present in the survey area. For soil, it is the effectiveness of selecting a soil sample containing the pest when the pest is present in the survey area. |
For column 12: | "Method sensitivity" means the probability of a method to correctly detect pest presence. The method sensitivity is defined as the probability that a truly positive host tests positive. It is the multiplication of the sampling effectiveness (i.e. probability of selecting infected plant parts from an infected plant) by the diagnostic sensitivity (characterised by the visual inspection and/or laboratory test used in the identification process). |
For column 13: | Provide the risk factors in different rows, using as many rows as necessary. For each risk factor indicate the risk level and corresponding relative risk and proportion of host population. |
For column B: | Indicate the details of the survey, depending on the specific legal requirements for each pest. Indicate with N/A when the information of certain column is not applicable. The information to be provided in these columns is related to the information included in the column 10 "Detection methods". |
For column 18: | Indicate the number of trapping sites in case this number differs from the number of traps (Column 17) (e.g. the same trap is used in different places). |
For column 21: | Indicate the number of samples found positive, negative or undetermined. "Undetermined" are those analysed samples for which no result was obtained due to different factors (e.g. below detection level, unprocessed sample-not identified, old, etc.). |
For column 22: | Indicate the outbreak notifications of the year when the survey took place for findings in the buffer zone. The outbreak notification number does not need to be included when the competent authority has decided that the finding is one of the cases referred to in Articles 14(2), 15(2) or 16 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031. In this case, please indicate the reason for not providing this information in column 25 ("Comments"). |
For column 23: | Indicate the sensitivity of the survey, as defined in International Standard for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM 31). This value of the achieved confidence level of pest freedom is calculated based on the examinations (and/or samples) performed given the method sensitivity and the design prevalence. |
For column 24: | Indicate the design prevalence based on a pre-survey estimate of the likely actual prevalence of the pest in the field. The design prevalence is set as a goal of the survey and corresponds to the compromise the risk managers are making between the risk of having the pest and the resources available for the survey. Typically, for a detection survey a value of 1 % is set |