Commission Regulation (EC) No 863/2006 of 13 June 2006 adjusting the delivery obligations for cane sugar to be imported under the ACP Protocol and the Agreement with India for the 2005/06 delivery period
Commission Regulation (EC) No 863/2006of 13 June 2006adjusting the delivery obligations for cane sugar to be imported under the ACP Protocol and the Agreement with India for the 2005/06 delivery periodTHE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sectorOJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16)., and in particular Article 39(6) thereof,Whereas:(1)Article 9 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 of 30 June 2003 laying down detailed rules of application for the 2003/04, 2004/05 and 2005/06 marketing years for the import of cane sugar under certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements and amending Regulations (EC) No 1464/95 and (EC) No 779/96OJ L 162, 1.7.2003, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 568/2005 (OJ L 97, 15.4.2005, p. 9). lays down the detailed rules for setting delivery obligations at zero duty for products falling within CN code 1701, expressed in white-sugar equivalent, for imports originating in the countries that are signatories to the ACP Protocol and to the Agreement with India.(2)These quantities were set, for the 2005/06 delivery period, by Commission Regulation (EC) No 180/2006OJ L 29, 2.2.2006, p. 28..(3)Article 7(1) and (2) of the ACP Protocol lays down rules for cases where an ACP State fails to deliver its agreed quantity.(4)The competent authorities of Saint Kitts and Nevis and of Trinidad and Tobago have informed the Commission that they will be unable to deliver their agreed quantities in full and that they do not wish to have the additional period for delivery.(5)After consultation with the ACP States concerned, a reallocation of the shortfall must therefore be carried out for delivery during the 2005/06 delivery period.(6)Regulation (EC) No 180/2006 should therefore be repealed, and the delivery obligations for the 2005/06 delivery period should be adjusted in accordance with Article 9(1) and (2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003.(7)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: