Commission Directive 98/53/EC of 16 July 1998 laying down the sampling methods and the methods of analysis for the official control of the levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs (Text with EEA relevance)
Modified by
  • Commission Directive 2002/27/ECof 13 March 2002amending Directive 98/53/EC laying down the sampling methods and the methods of analysis for the official control of the levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs(Text with EEA relevance), 32002L0027, March 16, 2002
  • Commission Directive 2003/121/ECof 15 December 2003amending Directive 98/53/EC laying down the sampling methods and the methods of analysis for the official control of the levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs(Text with EEA relevance), 32003L0121, December 19, 2003
  • Commission Directive 2004/43/ECof 13 April 2004amending Directive 98/53/EC and Directive 2002/26/EC as regards sampling methods and methods of analysis for the official control of the levels of aflatoxin and ochratoxin A in food for infants and young children(Text with EEA relevance), 32004L0043, April 20, 2004
  • Commission Regulation (EC) No 401/2006of 23 February 2006laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of mycotoxins in foodstuffs(Text with EEA relevance), 32006R0401, March 9, 2006
Commission Directive 98/53/ECof 16 July 1998laying down the sampling methods and the methods of analysis for the official control of the levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs(Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 85/591/EEC of 20 December 1985 concerning the introduction of Community methods of sampling and analysis for the monitoring of foodstuffs intended for human consumptionOJ L 372, 31. 12. 1985, p. 50., and in particular Article 1 thereof,Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 1525/98 of 16 July 1998, amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 194/97 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffsSee page 43 of this Official Journal. fixes maximum limits for aflatoxins in certain foodstuffs;Whereas Council Directive 93/99/EEC of 29 October 1993 on the subject of additional measures concerning the official control of foodstuffsOJ L 290, 24. 11. 1993, p. 14. introduces a system of quality standards for laboratories entrusted by the Member States with the official control of foodstuffs;Whereas sampling plays a crucial part in the precision of the determination of the levels of the aflatoxins which are very heterogeneously distributed in a lot;Whereas it seems necessary to fix general criteria which the method of analysis has to comply with in order to ensure that laboratories, in charge of the control, use methods of analysis with comparable levels of performance;Whereas the provisions for the sampling and methods of analysis have been drawn up on the basis of present knowledge and they may be adapted to take account of advances in scientific and technological knowledge;Whereas the methods of sampling used currently by the competent authorities largely differ in the Member States; whereas the competent authorities in certain Member States are not in a position to apply all the provisions of this Directive in a short time; whereas it is, therefore, necessary to provide a suitable period to apply these provisions;Whereas Member States will have to modify their methods of sampling gradually in order to comply with the provisions laid down in the Annexes to this Directive by the time the Directive has to be applied; whereas it is, therefore, appropriate to examine regularly with the Member States the application of these provisions;Whereas the measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Foodstuffs,HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Article 1The Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that the sampling for the official control of the levels of aflatoxins in foodstuffs is carried out in accordance with the methods described in Annex I of this Directive.
Article 2The Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that sample preparation and methods of analyses used for the official control of the levels of aflatoxins in foodstuffs comply with the criteria described in Annex II of this Directive.
Article 3The Member States shall, not later than 31 December 2000, bring into force the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with the provisions of this Directive. They shall forthwith notify the Commission thereof.When Member States adopt these provisions, the provisions shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference at the time of their official publication. The procedure for such reference shall be adopted by Member States.
Article 4This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.This Directive is addressed to the Member States.
nullANNEX IMethods of sampling for official checking control of the levels of aflatoxins in certain foodstuffs1.Purpose and scopeSamples intended for official checking of the levels of aflatoxin content in foodstuffs shall be taken according to the methods described below. Aggregate samples thus obtained shall be considered as representative of the lots. Compliance with maximum limits laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1525/98 shall be established on the basis of the levels determined in the laboratory samples.2.Definitions
Lot:an identifiable quantity of a food commodity delivered at one time and determined by the official to have common characteristics, such as origin, variety, type of packing, packer, consignor or markings.
Sublot:designated part of a large lot in order to apply the sampling method on that designated part. Each sublot must be physically separate and identifiable.
Incremental sample:a quantity of material taken from a single place in the lot or sublot.
Aggregate sample:the combined total of all the incremental samples taken from the lot or sublot.
Laboratory sample:sample intended for the laboratory ( = subsample).
3.General provisions3.1.PersonnelSampling shall be performed by an authorised person as specified by the Member States.3.2.Material to be sampledEach lot which is to be examined must be sampled separately. In accordance with the specific provisions in point 5 of this Annex, large lots should be subdivided into sublots to be sampled separately.3.3.Precautions to be takenIn the course of sampling and preparation of the laboratory samples precautions must be taken to avoid any changes which would affect the aflatoxin content, adversely affect the analytical determination or make the aggregate samples unrepresentative.3.4.Incremental samplesAs far as possible incremental samples should be taken at various places distributed throughout the lot or sublot. Departure from this procedure must be recorded in the record provided for in 3.8.3.5.Preparation of the aggregate sample and the laboratory samples (subsamples)The aggregate sample is made up by uniting and sufficiently mixing the incremental samples. After mixing, the aggregate sample must be divided into equal subsamples in accordance with the specific provisions of point 5 of this Annex.The mixing is necessary to ensure that each subsample contains portions of the whole lot or sublot.3.6.Replicate samplesThe replicate samples for enforcement, trade (defence) and referee purposes are to be taken from the homogenised laboratory sample, unless this conflicts with Member States' rules on sampling.3.7.Packaging and transmission of laboratory samplesEach laboratory sample shall be placed in a clean, inert container offering adequate protection from contamination and against damage in transit. All necessary precautions shall be taken to avoid any change in composition of the laboratory sample which might arise during transportation or storage.3.8.Sealing and labelling of laboratory samplesEach sample taken for official use shall be sealed at the place of sampling and identified following the Member State's regulations. A record must be kept of each sampling, permitting each lot to be identified unambiguously and giving the date and place of sampling together with any additional information likely to be of assistance to the analyst.4.Explanatory provisions4.1.Different types of lotsFood commodities may be traded in bulk, containers, or individual packings (sacks, bags, retail packings, etc.). The sampling procedure can be applied to all the different forms in which the commodities are put on the market.Without prejudice to the specific provisions as laid down in point 5 of this Annex, the following formula can be used as a guide for the sampling of lots traded in individual packings (sacks, bags, retail packings, etc.):Sampling frequency (SF) = Weight: in kgSampling frequency (SF): every nth sack or bag from which an incremental sample must be taken (decimal figures should be rounded to the nearest whole number).4.2.Weight of the incremental sampleThe weight of the incremental sample should be about 300 grams unless otherwise defined in point 5 of this Annex and with the exception of spices in which case the weight of the incremental sample is about 100 grams. In the case of retail packings, the weight of the incremental sample depends on the weight of the retail packing.4.3.Number of incremental samples for lots of less than 15 tonnesThe number of incremental samples to be taken depends on the weight of the lot, with a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 100, unless otherwise defined in point 5 of this Annex. The figures in the following table may be used to determine the number of incremental samples to be taken.
Table 1:Number of incremental samples to be taken depending on the weight of the lot
Lot weight(tonnes)No of incremental samples
≤ 0,110
> 0,1 - ≤ 0,215
> 0,2 - ≤ 0,520
> 0,5 - ≤ 1,030
> 1,0 - ≤ 2,040
> 2,0 - ≤ 5,060
> 5,0 - ≤ 10,080
> 10,0 - ≤ 15,0100
5.Specific provisions5.1.General survey of the sampling procedure for groundnuts, nuts, dried fruit, spices and cereals
Table 2:Subdivision of lots into sublots depending on product and lot weightDepending on the lot weight — see point 4.3 or 5.3 of this Annex.
CommodityLot weight(tonnes)Weight or number of sublotsNumber of incremental samplesAggregate sampleWeight (kg)
Dried figs and other dried fruit≥ 1515-30 tonnes10030
< 1510-100≤ 30
Groundnuts, pistachios, Brazil nuts and other nuts≥ 500100 tonnes10030
> 125 and < 5005 sublots10030
≥ 15 and ≤ 12525 tonnes10030
< 1510-100≤ 30
Cereals1500500 tonnes10030
> 300 and < 15003 sublots10030
≥ 50 and ≤ 300100 tonnes10030
< 5010-1001-10
Spices≥ 1525 tonnes10010
< 1510-1001-10
5.2.Groundnuts, pistachios and Brazil nutsDried figsCereals (lots ≥ 50 tonnes)Spices5.2.1.Sampling procedureOn condition that the sublot can be separated physically, each lot must be subdivided into sublots following Table 2 at point 5.1. Taking into account that the weight of the lot is not always an exact multiple of the weight of the sublots, the weight of the sublot may exceed the mentioned weight by a maximum of 20 %,each sublot must be sampled separately,number of incremental samples: 100. In the case of lots under 15 tonnes, the number of incremental samples to be taken depends on the weight of the lot, with a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 100 (see point 4.3),weight of the aggregate sample = 30 kg which has to be mixed and to be divided into three equal subsamples of 10 kg before grinding (this division into three subsamples is not necessary in the case of groundnuts, nuts, dried fruit and maize intended for further sorting or other physical treatment, however, this will depend upon the availability of equipment which is able to homogenise a 30 kg sample). In cases where the aggregate sample weights are under 10 kg, the aggregate sample must not be divided into three subsamples. In the case of spices the aggregate sample weighs not more than 10 kg and therefore no division in subsamples is necessary,laboratory sample: a subsample of 10 kg (each subsample must be separately ground finely and mixed thoroughly to achieve complete homogenisation, in accordance with the provisions laid down in Annex II),if it is not possible to carry out the method of sampling described above because of the commercial consequences resulting from damage to the lot (because of packaging forms, means of transport, etc.) an alternative method of sampling may be applied provided that it is as representative as possible and is fully described and documented.5.2.2.Acceptance of a lot or sublotFor groundnuts, nuts, dried fruit and maize subjected to a sorting or other physical treatment and spices:acceptance if the aggregate sample or the average of the subsamples conforms to the maximum limit, taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery,rejection if the aggregate sample or the average of the subsamples exceeds the maximum limit beyond reasonable doubt taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery,for groundnuts, nuts, dried fruit and cereals intended for direct human consumption and cereals, with the exception of maize, to be subjected to a sorting or other physical treatment:acceptance if none of the subsamples exceeds the maximum limit, taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery,rejection if one or more of the subsamples exceeds the maximum limit beyond reasonable doubt taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery,where the aggregate sample is under 10 kg:acceptance if the aggregate sample conforms to the maximum limit, taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery,rejection if the aggregate sample exceeds the maximum limit beyond reasonable doubt taking into account analytical uncertainty and correction for recovery.5.3.Nuts other than groundnuts, pistachios and Brazil nutsDried fruit other than figsCereals (lots under 50 tonnes)5.3.1.Sampling procedureFor these products, the sampling procedure laid down in point 5.2.1 may be applied. However, taking into account the low incidence of contamination for these products and/or the newer forms of packaging in which products can be traded, simpler sampling methods may be applied.For cereal lots under 50 tonnes, a sampling plan consisting of, depending on the lot weight, 10 to 100 incremental samples each of 100 grams, resulting in an aggregate sample of 1 to 10 kg may be used. The figures in the following table can be used to determine the number of incremental samples to be taken.
Table 3:Number of incremental samples to be taken depending on the weight of the lot of cereals
Lot weight(tonnes)Number of incremental samples
≤ 110
> 1 - ≤320
> 3 - ≤1040
> 10 - ≤2060
> 20 - ≤50100
5.3.2.Acceptance of a lot or sublotSee point 5.2.2.
5.4.Milk5.4.1.Sampling procedureSampling in accordance with Commission Decision 91/180/EEC of 14 February 1991 laying down certain methods of analysis and testing of raw milk and heat-treated milkOJ L 93, 13. 4. 1991, p. 1.:number of incremental samples: minimum 5,weight of aggregate sample: minimum 0,5 kg or litres.5.4.2.Acceptance of a lot or sublotAcceptance if the aggregate sample conforms to the maximum limit, taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery,rejection if the aggregate sample exceeds the maximum limit beyond reasonable doubt taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery.5.5.Derived products and compound foods5.5.1.Milk products5.5.1.1.Sampling procedureSampling in accordance with Commission Directive 87/524/EEC of 6 October 1987 laying down Community methods of sampling for chemical analysis for the monitoring of preserved milk productsOJ L 306, 28. 10. 1987, p. 24..Number of incremental samples: minimum 5.For the other milk products an equivalent method of sampling is used.5.5.1.2.Acceptance of a lot or sublotAcceptance if the aggregate sample conforms to the maximum limit, taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery,rejection if the aggregate sample exceeds the maximum limit beyond reasonable doubt taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery.5.5.2.Other derived products with very small particle weight, i.e. flour, fig paste, peanut butter (homogeneous distribution of aflatoxin contamination)5.5.2.1.Sampling procedureNumber of incremental samples: 100. For lots of under 50 tonnes the number of incremental samples should be 10 to 100, depending on the lot weight (see Table 3 at point 5.3.1 of this Annex),the weight of the incremental sample should be about 100 grams. In the case of lots in retail packing, the weight of the incremental sample depends on the weight of the retail packing,weight of aggregate sample = 1-10 kg sufficiently mixed.5.5.2.2.Number of samples to be takenThe number of aggregate samples to be taken depends on the lot weight. The division of large lots into sublots must be done as defined for cereals in Table 2 under point 5.1,each sublot must be sampled separately.5.5.2.3Acceptance of a lot or sublotAcceptance if the aggregate sample conforms to the maximum limit, taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery,rejection if the aggregate sample exceeds the maximum limit beyond reasonable doubt taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery.5.6.Other derived products with a relatively large particle size (heterogeneous distribution of aflatoxin contamination)Sampling procedure and acceptance as defined at points 5.2 and 5.3 of this Annex for the raw agricultural product.5.7.Foods intended for infants and young children5.7.1.Sampling procedureThe sampling procedure as mentioned for milk and derived products as well as for compound food in points 5.4, 5.5 and 5.6 applies.5.7.2.Acceptance of a lotAcceptance if the aggregate sample conforms to the maximum limit, taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery,Rejection if the aggregate sample exceeds the maximum limit beyond reasonable doubt, taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery.
6.Sampling at retail stageSampling of foodstuffs at the retail stage should be done where possible in accordance with the above sampling provisions. Where this is not possible, other effective sampling procedures at retail stage can be used provided that they ensure sufficient representativeness for the sampled lot.
ANNEX IISample preparation and criteria for methods of analysis used in official checking of the levels of aflatoxins in certain foodstuffs1.Introduction1.1.PrecautionsDaylight should be excluded as much as possible during the procedure, since aflatoxin gradually breaks down under the influence of ultra-violet light. As the distribution of aflatoxin is extremely non-homogeneous, samples should be prepared — and especially homogenised — with extreme care.All the material received by the laboratory is to be used for the preparation of test material.1.2.Calculation of proportion of shell/kernel of whole nutsThe limits fixed for aflatoxins in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1525/98 apply to the edible part.The level of aflatoxins in the edible part can be determined by:shelling samples of nuts "in shell" and the level of aflatoxins is directly determined in the edible part,homogenise the nuts "in shell" by taking them through the sample preparation procedure. The sampling and analytical procedure must estimate the weight of nut kernel in the aggregate sample. The weight of nut kernel in the aggregate sample is estimated after establishing a suitable factor for the proportion of nut shell to nut kernel in whole nuts. This proportion is used to ascertain the amount of kernel in the bulk sample taken through the sample preparation and analysis procedure. Approximately 100 whole nuts are taken at random separately from the lot or are to be put aside from each aggregate sample. The ratio may, for each laboratory sample, be obtained by weighing the whole nuts, shelling and re-weighing the shell and kernel portions. However, the proportion of shell to kernel may be established by the laboratory from a number of samples and so can be assumed for future analytical work. But if a particular laboratory sample is found to be in contravention of any limit, the proportion should be determined for that sample using the approximately 100 nuts that have been set aside.2.Treatment of the sample as received in the laboratoryFinely grind and thoroughly mix each laboratory sample using a process that has been demonstrated to achieve complete homogenisation.In case the maximum level applies to the dry matter, the dry matter content shall be determined on a part of the homogenised sample, using a procedure that has been demonstrated to determine accurately the dry matter content.3.Subdivision of samples for enforcement and defence purposesThe replicate samples for enforcement, trade (defence) and referee purposes shall be taken from the homogenised material unless this conflicts with Member States' rules on sampling.4.Method of analysis to be used by the laboratory and laboratory control requirements4.1.DefinitionsA number of the most commonly used definitions that the laboratory will be required to use are given below:The most commonly quoted precision parameters are repeatability and reproducibility.rrepeatability, the value below which the absolute difference between two single test results obtained under repeatability conditions (i. e. same sample, same operator, same apparatus, same laboratory, and short interval of time) may be expected to lie within a specific probability (typically 95 %) and hence r = 2,8 × srsrStandard deviation, calculated from results generated under repeatability conditionsRSDrrelative standard deviation, calculated from results generated under repeatability conditions [(Sr/x) × 100], where x is the average of results over all laboratories and samplesRreproducibility, the value below which the absolute difference between single test results obtained under reproducibility conditions (i. e. on identical material obtained by operators in different laboratories, using the standardised test method) may be expected to lie within a certain probability (typically 95 %); R = 2,8 sRsRstandard deviation, calculated from results under reproducibility conditionsRSDRrelative standard deviation calculated from results generated under reproducibility conditions [(SR/x) × 100]4.2.General requirementsMethods of analysis used for food control purposes must comply whenever possible with the provisions of points 1 and 2 of the Annex to Council Directive 85/591/EEC.4.3.Specific requirementsWhere no specific methods for the determination of aflatoxin levels in foodstuffs are prescribed at Community level, laboratories may select any method provided the selected method meets the following criteria:
Precision RSDr may be calculated as 0,66 times precision RSDR at the concentration of interest.
CriterionConcentration rangeRecommended valueMaximum permitted value
BlanksAllNegligible
Recovery — Aflatoxin M10,01-0,05 μg/kg60 to 120 %
>0,05 μg/kg70 to 110 %
Recovery — Aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, G2< 1,0 μg/kg50 to 120 %
1-10 μg/kg70 to 110 %
>10 μg/kg80 to 110 %
Precision RSDRAllAs derived from Horwitz equation2 × value derived from Horwitz equation
Notes:Values to apply to both B1 and sum of B1+ B2+ G1+ G2,if sum of individual aflatoxins B1+ B2+ G1+ G2 are to be reported, then response of each to the analytical system must be either known or equivalent,the detection limits of the methods used are not stated as the precision values are given at the concentrations of interest,the precision values are calculated from the Horwitz equation, i. e.:RSDR = 2 (1-0,5 logC)where:RSDR is the relative standard deviation calculated from results generated under reproducibility conditions [(SR/x) × 100]C is the concentration ratio (i. e. 1 = 100 g/100 g, 0,001 = 1000 mg/kg).This is a generalised precision equation which has been found to be independant of analyte and matrix but solely dependent on concentration for most routine methods of analysis.
4.4.Recovery calculation and reporting of resultsThe analytical result is to be reported corrected or uncorrected for recovery. The manner of reporting and the level of recovery must be reported. The analytical result corrected for recovery is used for checking compliance (see Annex I, points 5.2.2, 5.3.2, 5.4.2, 5.5.1.2 and 5.5.2.3).The analytical result has to be reported as x +/- U whereby x is the analytical result and U is the expanded measurement uncertainty, using a coverage factor of 2 which gives a level of confidence of approximately 95 %.4.5.Laboratory quality standardsLaboratories must comply with Council Directive 93/99/EEC.